Скачать книгу

Helene (2004): Identities that cannot exist: Gender Studies und Literaturdidaktik. In: Bredella, Lothar/Delanoy, Werner/Surkamp, Carola (Hrsg.), Literaturdidaktik im Dialog. Tübingen: Narr, S.181-206.

      Delanoy, Werner (2002): Fremdsprachlicher Literaturunterricht: Theorie und Praxis als Dialog. Tübingen: Narr.

      Delanoy, Werner (2014): Transkulturalität als begriffliche und konzeptuelle Herausforderung an die Fremdsprachendidaktik? In: Matz, Frauke/Rogge, Michael/Siepmann, Philipp (Hrsg.), Transkulturelles Lernen im Fremdsprachenunterricht: Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, S.19-35.

      Eisenmann, Maria/Ludwig, Christian (Hrsg.) (2018): Queer Beats: Gender and Literature in the EFL Classroom. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.

      Fairclough, Norman (Hrsg.) (1992): Critical Language Awareness. London/New York: Longman.

      Fairclough, Norman (2015): Language and Power. New York: Routledge.

      Fehling, Sylvia (2010): Critical Language Awareness im bilingualen Unterricht: Relevanz für die Lernenden und unterrichtliche Umsetzungsmöglichkeiten. In: Doff, Sabine (Hrsg.), Bilingualer Sachfachunterricht in der Sekundarstufe. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr, S.182-195.

      Foucault, Michel (1971): L’ordre du discours: Leçon inaugurale au Collège de France prononcée le 2 décembre 1970. Paris: Gallimard.

      Freire, Paulo (1976): Education: The Practice of Freedom. London: Writers and Readers.

      Freire, Paulo (2014): Pedagogy of Hope. Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Bloomsbury.

      Garvin, Jeff (2016): Symptoms of Being Human. New York: Harper Collins.

      Gino, Alex (2015): George. New York: Scholastic.

      Giroux, Henry (1983): Theory and Resistance in Education. South Hadley: Bergin & Garvey.

      Gray, John (2002): The global coursebook in English language teaching. In: Block, David/Cameron, Deborah (Hrsg.), Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge, S.151-166.

      Gutenberg, Andrea (2013): Gendering/Queering the language classroom. Gender und queer studies als Herausforderung für das schulische Fremdsprachenlernen. In: Kleinau, Elke/Schulz, Dirk/Völker, Susanne (Hrsg.), Gender in Bewegung. Aktuelle Spannungsfelder der Gender und Queer Studies. Bielefeld: transcript, S.107-120.

      Iser, Wolfgang (1976): Der Akt des Lesens. Theorie ästhetischer Wirkung. München: Fink.

      Jeyaraj, Joanna Joseph/Harland, Tony (2016): Teaching with critical pedagogy in ELT: The problems of indoctrination and risk. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 24(4), S.587-598.

      Kirchhoff, Petra (2019): Kanondiskussion und Textauswahl. In: Stierstorfer, Klaus/Lütge, Christiane (Hrsg.), Grundthemen der Literaturwissenschaft. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 219-230.

      Krulatz, Anna/Steen-Olsen, Tove/Torgersen, Eivind (2018): Towards critical cultural and linguistic awareness in language classrooms in Norway: Fostering respect for diversity through identity texts. Language Teaching Research 22(5), S.552-569.

      Leonhardt, Jan-Erik/Gantner, Christina/Kaufmann, Carina (2020): What am I? Machart und Perspektivierung von Dokumentarfilmen kennenlernen, selbst einen Dokumentarfilm drehen. Der fremdsprachliche Unterricht Englisch 163, S.10-13.

      Mihan, Anne (2018): The art of being normal: Trans issues in the EFL classroom. In: Eisenmann, Maria/Ludwig, Christian (Hrsg), Queer Beats: Gender and Literature in the EFL Classroom. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, S.207-229.

      Moncada Linares, Sthephanny (2016): Othering: Towards a critical cultural awareness in the language classroom. HOW 23(1), S.129-146.

      Pavlenko, Aneta (2004): Gender and sexuality in foreign and second language education: Critical and feminist approaches. In: Norton, Bonny/Toohey, Kelleen (Hrsg.), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S.53-71.

      Phillipson, Robert (1992): Linguistic Imperialism. New York: Routledge.

      Phillipson, Robert (2009): Linguistic Imperialism Continued. New York: Routledge.

      Phipps, Alison/Guilherme, Manuela (2004): Introduction: Why languages and intercultural communication are never just neutral. In: Dies. (Hrsg.), Critical Pedagogy: Political Approaches to Language and Intercultural Communication. Clevedon u.a.: Multilingual Matters, S.1-6.

      Plikat, Jochen (2017): Fremdsprachliche Diskursbewusstheit als Zielkonstrukt des Fremdsprachenunterrichts. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit der Interkulturellen Kompetenz. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.

      Razfa, Aria/Rumenapp, Joseph C. (2012): Language ideologies in English learner classrooms: critical reflections and the role of explicit awareness. Language Awareness 21(4), S.347-368.

      Russo, Meredith (2016): If I Was Your Girl. London: Usborne.

      Sowden, Colin (2008): There’s more to life than politics. ELT Journal 62(3), S.284-291.

      Viebrock, Britta (2016): Fostering film literacy in English language teaching. In: Viebrock, Britta (Hrsg.), Feature Films in English Language Teaching. Tübingen: Narr, S.13-30.

      Viebrock, Britta (2018): Just another prefix? From inter- to transcultural foreign language learning and beyond. In: Breidbach, Stephan/Küster, Lutz/Schmenk, Barbara (Hrsg.), Sloganizations in Language Education Discourse. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, S.72-93.

      Wild, Reiner (1982): Die kritische Funktion der Literatur. In: Ders. (Hrsg.), Literatur im Prozeß der Zivilisation. Stuttgart: Metzler, S.118-126.

      Williamson, Lisa (2015): The Art of Being Normal. Oxford: Fickling.

      Taking a stance: The role of critical literacies in learning with literature in a world at risk

       Frauke Matz

      1. Introduction: English Language Education as ‘Political Activity’ and ‘Moral Act’

      Education is, in essence, both “a political activity” (Akbari 2008: 277) and “a moral act” (Jackson 2019: 144) and should enable young people to not just think critically, to reflect on society and their role within it, but it should also allow them to take a stance on their own rights and those of others – this also holds true for learning with literary texts in foreign language classrooms. Critical pedagogy aims to do just this and more, as it “seeks empowerment and social transformation” (Banegas/Villacañas de Castro 2016: 455). However, although aspects of critical theory have left a lasting effect on the German school curricula, critical pedagogy has yet to play a prominent role through binding curricular guidelines or regarding research within the field of English as foreign language education in general and in literature didactics in particular.1 Nonetheless, the German curricula for learning English at higher levels do entail aspects that appear to be closely related to critical pedagogy, if not in name but in spirit. Language education is envisaged to play a significant role in enabling students to achieve the so-called overall educational aims (allgemeine Bildungsziele), amongst which are political responsibility and independent critical judgment (cf. KMK 2005: 7). Hence, it seems that German foreign language education at an advanced level already relates to the classroom context and aims at “social transformation through education” (Akbari 2008: 276). The “questions of social justice and social change”, which are at the heart of critical pedagogy, are also the underlying questions of the compulsory topics within the English as a foreign language lessons. These include “political, social and cultural realities and their historical backgrounds” as well as “global challenges and visions of the future” (QUA-LiS 2020: 4-6), which serve as the basis for teaching, learning and assessing students at higher levels. Therefore, Ramin Akbari’s (2008: 278) concern that “language teaching is viewed mainly as cognitive activity with few socio-political implications” and that even “when the social dimensions of language are acknowledged, the social reality of language learning

Скачать книгу