LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

its work?

      <--- Score

      62. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      63. Are the Technical Reference Model requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      64. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      65. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Technical Reference Model goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      66. What is the scope of the Technical Reference Model work?

      <--- Score

      67. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      68. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      69. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      70. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      71. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      72. What is the definition of Technical Reference Model excellence?

      <--- Score

      73. Are accountability and ownership for Technical Reference Model clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      74. Is Technical Reference Model currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      75. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      76. What are the Technical Reference Model use cases?

      <--- Score

      77. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      78. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      79. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      80. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      81. Do you all define Technical Reference Model in the same way?

      <--- Score

      82. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      83. Is Technical Reference Model required?

      <--- Score

      84. Are the Technical Reference Model requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      85. How does the Technical Reference Model manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      86. Why are you doing Technical Reference Model and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      87. Is special Technical Reference Model user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      88. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      89. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      90. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Technical Reference Model changes?

      <--- Score

      91. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Technical Reference Model results are met?

      <--- Score

      92. Has the Technical Reference Model work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      93. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      94. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      95. When is/was the Technical Reference Model start date?

      <--- Score

      96. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Technical Reference Model work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      97. How would you define Technical Reference Model leadership?

      <--- Score

      98. How will the Technical Reference Model team and the group measure complete success of Technical Reference Model?

      <--- Score

      99. Is the scope of Technical Reference Model defined?

      <--- Score

      100. How are consistent Technical Reference Model definitions important?

      <--- Score

      101. How did the Technical Reference Model manager receive input to the development of a Technical Reference Model improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      102. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      103. Have all basic functions of Technical Reference Model been defined?

      <--- Score

      104. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      105. Will a Technical Reference Model production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      106. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      107. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      108. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      109. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      110. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      111. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      112. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      113. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      114. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      115. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      116.

Скачать книгу