LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the record-keeping requirements of Group text activities?

      <--- Score

      25. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      26. Are accountability and ownership for Group text clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      27. What Group text requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      28. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      29. What are (control) requirements for Group text Information?

      <--- Score

      30. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Group text work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      31. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      32. What are the Group text tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      33. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      34. What is the scope of Group text?

      <--- Score

      35. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      36. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      37. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      38. Are the Group text requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      39. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      40. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      41. Who approved the Group text scope?

      <--- Score

      42. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      43. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      44. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      45. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      46. How would you define Group text leadership?

      <--- Score

      47. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      48. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      49. Have all basic functions of Group text been defined?

      <--- Score

      50. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      51. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Group text results are met?

      <--- Score

      52. What happens if Group text’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      53. Is there a critical path to deliver Group text results?

      <--- Score

      54. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      55. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      56. Has a Group text requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      57. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      58. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      59. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      60. Is there a clear Group text case definition?

      <--- Score

      61. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Group text changes?

      <--- Score

      62. Is special Group text user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      63. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      64. Is there any additional Group text definition of success?

      <--- Score

      65. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      66. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      67. How does the Group text manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      68. What are the Group text use cases?

      <--- Score

      69. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      70. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      71. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      72. What would be the goal or target for a Group text’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      73. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      74. What is the scope of the Group text effort?

      <--- Score

      75. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      76. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      77. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      78. How do you hand over Group text context?

      <--- Score

      79. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Group text? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      80. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Group text brings?

      <--- Score

      81. How can the value of Group text be defined?

      <---

Скачать книгу