LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      68. Is there a Emergency planning management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      69. How does the Emergency planning manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      70. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      71. What system do you use for gathering Emergency planning information?

      <--- Score

      72. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      73. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      74. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Emergency planning? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      75. What is the scope of Emergency planning?

      <--- Score

      76. How are consistent Emergency planning definitions important?

      <--- Score

      77. Will team members perform Emergency planning work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      78. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      79. How have you defined all Emergency planning requirements first?

      <--- Score

      80. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      81. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      82. Will team members regularly document their Emergency planning work?

      <--- Score

      83. What are (control) requirements for Emergency planning Information?

      <--- Score

      84. What is the scope of the Emergency planning work?

      <--- Score

      85. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      86. Do you all define Emergency planning in the same way?

      <--- Score

      87. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      88. How can the value of Emergency planning be defined?

      <--- Score

      89. What are the record-keeping requirements of Emergency planning activities?

      <--- Score

      90. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      91. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Emergency planning brings?

      <--- Score

      92. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      93. Is Emergency planning currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      94. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      95. How do you manage changes in Emergency planning requirements?

      <--- Score

      96. What Emergency planning requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      97. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      98. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      99. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      100. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      101. How would you define Emergency planning leadership?

      <--- Score

      102. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      103. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      104. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      105. What sources do you use to gather information for a Emergency planning study?

      <--- Score

      106. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      107. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      108. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      109. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      110. How will the Emergency planning team and the group measure complete success of Emergency planning?

      <--- Score

      111. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      112. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      113. Do you have a Emergency planning success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      114. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      115. When is/was the Emergency planning start date?

      <--- Score

      116. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      117. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      118. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Emergency planning?

      <--- Score

      119. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      120. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      121. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      122. Is there a critical path to deliver Emergency planning results?

      <---

Скачать книгу