Скачать книгу

of Emergency planning been defined?

      <--- Score

      12. Are accountability and ownership for Emergency planning clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      13. Are the Emergency planning requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      14. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      15. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Emergency planning changes?

      <--- Score

      16. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      17. Will a Emergency planning production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      18. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      19. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      20. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      21. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      22. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      23. Is the scope of Emergency planning defined?

      <--- Score

      24. Is special Emergency planning user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      25. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      26. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      27. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      28. How did the Emergency planning manager receive input to the development of a Emergency planning improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      29. Is Emergency planning linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      30. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Emergency planning goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      31. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Emergency planning results are met?

      <--- Score

      32. Has a Emergency planning requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      33. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      34. What are the Emergency planning use cases?

      <--- Score

      35. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      36. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      37. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      38. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      39. How do you think the partners involved in Emergency planning would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      40. What is the scope of the Emergency planning effort?

      <--- Score

      41. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      42. What would be the goal or target for a Emergency planning’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      43. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      44. Is there a clear Emergency planning case definition?

      <--- Score

      45. Has the Emergency planning work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      46. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      47. What happens if Emergency planning’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      48. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      49. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      50. Is the Emergency planning scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      51. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      52. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      53. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      54. How do you hand over Emergency planning context?

      <--- Score

      55. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      56. How do you gather Emergency planning requirements?

      <--- Score

      57. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      58. Is the Emergency planning scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      59. How do you catch Emergency planning definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      60. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      61. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      62. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      63. What are the core elements of the Emergency planning business case?

      <--- Score

      64. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      65. What Emergency planning services do you require?

      <--- Score

      66. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      67.

Скачать книгу