ТОП просматриваемых книг сайта:
Medical History A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Читать онлайн.Название Medical History A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781867461050
Автор произведения Gerardus Blokdyk
Жанр Зарубежная деловая литература
Издательство Ingram
13. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Medical history brings?
<--- Score
14. How do you gather the stories?
<--- Score
15. How do you manage unclear Medical history requirements?
<--- Score
16. Will team members perform Medical history work when assigned and in a timely fashion?
<--- Score
17. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
18. What are the record-keeping requirements of Medical history activities?
<--- Score
19. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
20. How will the Medical history team and the group measure complete success of Medical history?
<--- Score
21. What are the core elements of the Medical history business case?
<--- Score
22. How does the Medical history manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
23. What is the scope of Medical history?
<--- Score
24. What gets examined?
<--- Score
25. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
26. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
27. How do you think the partners involved in Medical history would have defined success?
<--- Score
28. Is there a critical path to deliver Medical history results?
<--- Score
29. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
30. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
31. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
32. Are the Medical history requirements complete?
<--- Score
33. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
34. What is the scope of the Medical history effort?
<--- Score
35. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
36. Is Medical history required?
<--- Score
37. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Medical history goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
39. What happens if Medical history’s scope changes?
<--- Score
40. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
41. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
42. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
43. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
44. Is the Medical history scope manageable?
<--- Score
45. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
46. What Medical history requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
47. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?
<--- Score
48. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
49. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Medical history leverage and how?
<--- Score
50. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
51. Is the scope of Medical history defined?
<--- Score
52. How have you defined all Medical history requirements first?
<--- Score
53. Are accountability and ownership for Medical history clearly defined?
<--- Score
54. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
55. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
56. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
57. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
58. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
59. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
60. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
61. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
62. Is there a clear Medical history case definition?
<--- Score
63. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
64. Has the Medical history work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
65. What are the Medical history use cases?
<--- Score
66. Is there a Medical history management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?
<--- Score
67. Who approved the Medical history scope?
<--- Score
68. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?