LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      9. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      10. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      11. Is there a clear Personal Access System case definition?

      <--- Score

      12. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      13. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      14. What Personal Access System requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      15. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Personal Access System leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      16. What are (control) requirements for Personal Access System Information?

      <--- Score

      17. Is Personal Access System required?

      <--- Score

      18. Will a Personal Access System production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      19. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      20. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      21. What happens if Personal Access System’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      22. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      23. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      24. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      25. What are the core elements of the Personal Access System business case?

      <--- Score

      26. Will team members perform Personal Access System work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      27. Is the Personal Access System scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      28. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      29. Is special Personal Access System user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      30. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      31. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      32. Who is gathering Personal Access System information?

      <--- Score

      33. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      34. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      35. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      36. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      37. Is Personal Access System currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      38. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      39. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      40. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Personal Access System work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      41. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      42. Is Personal Access System linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      43. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      44. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      45. Are the Personal Access System requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      46. Is there any additional Personal Access System definition of success?

      <--- Score

      47. Will team members regularly document their Personal Access System work?

      <--- Score

      48. How do you manage changes in Personal Access System requirements?

      <--- Score

      49. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      50. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      51. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      52. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Personal Access System goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      54. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Personal Access System? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      55. What are the Personal Access System tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      56. What sources do you use to gather information for a Personal Access System study?

      <--- Score

      57. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      58. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      59. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      60. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      61. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      62. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      63. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      64. What would be the goal or target for a Personal Access System’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      65. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders,

Скачать книгу