LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      15. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      16. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      17. Has the Regenerative farming work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      18. What are the Regenerative farming tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      19. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      20. Is Regenerative farming linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      21. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      22. What happens if Regenerative farming’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      23. How will the Regenerative farming team and the group measure complete success of Regenerative farming?

      <--- Score

      24. What system do you use for gathering Regenerative farming information?

      <--- Score

      25. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      26. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      27. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      28. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      29. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      30. When is/was the Regenerative farming start date?

      <--- Score

      31. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      32. What is the scope of Regenerative farming?

      <--- Score

      33. Has a Regenerative farming requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      34. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      35. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      36. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      37. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      38. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      39. How do you gather Regenerative farming requirements?

      <--- Score

      40. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      41. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      42. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      43. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      44. What is the scope of the Regenerative farming effort?

      <--- Score

      45. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      46. Do you all define Regenerative farming in the same way?

      <--- Score

      47. Will a Regenerative farming production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      48. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Regenerative farming results are met?

      <--- Score

      49. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      50. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      51. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      52. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      53. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      54. Why are you doing Regenerative farming and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      55. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      56. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      57. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      58. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      59. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      60. What would be the goal or target for a Regenerative farming’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      61. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      62. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      63. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      64. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      65. How can the value of Regenerative farming be defined?

      <--- Score

      66. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you catch Regenerative farming definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      68. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      69. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Regenerative farming work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      70. Are the Regenerative farming requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      71. Is the Regenerative farming scope complete and

Скачать книгу