LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

How did the High Finance manager receive input to the development of a High Finance improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      77. What system do you use for gathering High Finance information?

      <--- Score

      78. When is/was the High Finance start date?

      <--- Score

      79. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      80. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      81. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      82. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      83. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      84. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      85. Is there a clear High Finance case definition?

      <--- Score

      86. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      87. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      88. Is High Finance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      89. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      90. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      91. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      92. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      93. Who approved the High Finance scope?

      <--- Score

      94. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      95. What is the definition of High Finance excellence?

      <--- Score

      96. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      97. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      98. How do you hand over High Finance context?

      <--- Score

      99. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      100. What are the High Finance tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      101. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      102. Is the High Finance scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      103. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      104. Is there any additional High Finance definition of success?

      <--- Score

      105. What would be the goal or target for a High Finance’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      106. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      107. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      108. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      109. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      110. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      111. What are (control) requirements for High Finance Information?

      <--- Score

      112. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      113. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      114. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that High Finance brings?

      <--- Score

      115. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on High Finance?

      <--- Score

      116. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected High Finance results are met?

      <--- Score

      117. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      118. What High Finance requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      119. How do you gather High Finance requirements?

      <--- Score

      120. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      121. How will the High Finance team and the group measure complete success of High Finance?

      <--- Score

      122. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      123. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      124. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      125. Has the High Finance work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      126. How can the value of High Finance be defined?

      <--- Score

      127. Has a High Finance requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      128. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      129. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      130. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the High Finance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      131. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

Скачать книгу