LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Score

      10. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      11. What are (control) requirements for Construction robots Information?

      <--- Score

      12. What are the Construction robots use cases?

      <--- Score

      13. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      14. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Construction robots goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      15. Is there a clear Construction robots case definition?

      <--- Score

      16. Are the Construction robots requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      17. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      18. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      19. Is the Construction robots scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      20. How do you manage unclear Construction robots requirements?

      <--- Score

      21. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      22. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      23. What are the Construction robots tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      24. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      25. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      26. How can the value of Construction robots be defined?

      <--- Score

      27. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      28. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      29. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      30. Has the Construction robots work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      31. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      32. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      33. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      34. Have all basic functions of Construction robots been defined?

      <--- Score

      35. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      36. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      37. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      39. What system do you use for gathering Construction robots information?

      <--- Score

      40. Are accountability and ownership for Construction robots clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      41. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      42. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      43. Is the scope of Construction robots defined?

      <--- Score

      44. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Construction robots changes?

      <--- Score

      45. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      46. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Construction robots work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      47. How have you defined all Construction robots requirements first?

      <--- Score

      48. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      49. Is the Construction robots scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      50. How do you gather Construction robots requirements?

      <--- Score

      51. Will a Construction robots production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      52. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      53. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      54. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      55. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Construction robots?

      <--- Score

      56. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      57. What is the scope of the Construction robots effort?

      <--- Score

      58. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      59. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      60. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      61. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      62. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      63. Is Construction robots currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      64. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Construction robots leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      65. How will variation in the

Скачать книгу