LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      67. What are the Management ethics use cases?

      <--- Score

      68. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      69. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      70. Is there a Management ethics management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      71. When is/was the Management ethics start date?

      <--- Score

      72. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Management ethics changes?

      <--- Score

      73. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      74. What is the scope of Management ethics?

      <--- Score

      75. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      76. How can the value of Management ethics be defined?

      <--- Score

      77. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      78. How are consistent Management ethics definitions important?

      <--- Score

      79. Are accountability and ownership for Management ethics clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      80. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      81. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      82. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      83. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      84. Are the Management ethics requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      85. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      86. How will the Management ethics team and the group measure complete success of Management ethics?

      <--- Score

      87. What would be the goal or target for a Management ethics’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      88. How do you manage unclear Management ethics requirements?

      <--- Score

      89. Is the Management ethics scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      90. Is the scope of Management ethics defined?

      <--- Score

      91. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      92. Who are the Management ethics improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      93. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      94. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      95. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      96. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      97. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      98. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      99. How do you hand over Management ethics context?

      <--- Score

      100. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      101. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      102. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      103. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      104. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      105. What are the core elements of the Management ethics business case?

      <--- Score

      106. Have all basic functions of Management ethics been defined?

      <--- Score

      107. How does the Management ethics manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      108. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      109. What is the definition of Management ethics excellence?

      <--- Score

      110. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      111. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Management ethics brings?

      <--- Score

      112. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      113. Is there a clear Management ethics case definition?

      <--- Score

      114. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      115. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Management ethics goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      116. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      117. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      118. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      119. Has the Management ethics work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      120.

Скачать книгу