Скачать книгу

Score

      12. Do you all define Student leadership in the same way?

      <--- Score

      13. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      14. What is the scope of the Student leadership effort?

      <--- Score

      15. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      16. Has the Student leadership work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      17. Will team members regularly document their Student leadership work?

      <--- Score

      18. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      19. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      20. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      21. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      22. When is/was the Student leadership start date?

      <--- Score

      23. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the core elements of the Student leadership business case?

      <--- Score

      25. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      26. Is the Student leadership scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      27. How would you define Student leadership leadership?

      <--- Score

      28. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      29. Are accountability and ownership for Student leadership clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      30. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      31. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      32. Who approved the Student leadership scope?

      <--- Score

      33. Is Student leadership linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      34. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      35. How do you think the partners involved in Student leadership would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      36. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      37. What is the scope of the Student leadership work?

      <--- Score

      38. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      39. Is the Student leadership scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      40. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      41. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Student leadership?

      <--- Score

      42. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Student leadership results are met?

      <--- Score

      43. What happens if Student leadership’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      44. Is there a critical path to deliver Student leadership results?

      <--- Score

      45. Have all basic functions of Student leadership been defined?

      <--- Score

      46. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      47. What are the record-keeping requirements of Student leadership activities?

      <--- Score

      48. What Student leadership services do you require?

      <--- Score

      49. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      50. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Student leadership? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      51. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      52. Will a Student leadership production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      54. Is there any additional Student leadership definition of success?

      <--- Score

      55. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      56. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      57. What would be the goal or target for a Student leadership’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      58. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Student leadership work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      59. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the Student leadership tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      61. Are the Student leadership requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      62. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      63. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      64. What Student leadership requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      65. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Student leadership changes?

      <--- Score

      66. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      67. What are the

Скачать книгу