LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

susceptible is it to Emotional development changes?

      <--- Score

      8. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      9. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      10. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      11. What would be the goal or target for a Emotional development’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      12. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      13. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      14. Do you all define Emotional development in the same way?

      <--- Score

      15. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      16. How does the Emotional development manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      17. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      18. How will the Emotional development team and the group measure complete success of Emotional development?

      <--- Score

      19. What are the core elements of the Emotional development business case?

      <--- Score

      20. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      21. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      22. How have you defined all Emotional development requirements first?

      <--- Score

      23. What is the scope of the Emotional development work?

      <--- Score

      24. What is the scope of the Emotional development effort?

      <--- Score

      25. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      26. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      27. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Emotional development goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      28. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      29. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      30. Who are the Emotional development improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      31. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      32. Who is gathering Emotional development information?

      <--- Score

      33. Is the Emotional development scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      34. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      35. Has the Emotional development work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      36. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      37. When is/was the Emotional development start date?

      <--- Score

      38. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      39. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      40. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      41. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      42. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      43. What are (control) requirements for Emotional development Information?

      <--- Score

      44. What is the scope of Emotional development?

      <--- Score

      45. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      46. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      47. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      48. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      49. What happens if Emotional development’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      50. Do you have a Emotional development success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      51. Are accountability and ownership for Emotional development clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      52. What Emotional development services do you require?

      <--- Score

      53. Is there a clear Emotional development case definition?

      <--- Score

      54. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      55. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Emotional development brings?

      <--- Score

      56. Is there any additional Emotional development definition of success?

      <--- Score

      57. Is the scope of Emotional development defined?

      <--- Score

      58. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Emotional development work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      59. Is Emotional development linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      60. How do you catch Emotional development definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      61. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should

Скачать книгу