Скачать книгу

information is the activity of gathering or collecting information from systems or people. In the context of social engineering, it is used as a research method in order to craft a more effective pretext. A pretext is a false statement crafted to sound believable in order to convince you to act or respond in favor of the attacker. Any and all of the social engineering techniques covered in this chapter can be used both as a weapon to harm the target victim and as a means to obtain more information (or access). Thus, social engineering is a tool of both reconnaissance and attack. Data gathered via social engineering can be used to support a physical or logical/technical attack.

      Any means or method by which a social engineer can gather information from the target is eliciting information. Any fact or truth or detail that can be collected, gathered, or gleaned from the target can be used to form a more complete and believable pretext or false story, which in turn may increase the chance of success of the next level or stage of an attack.

      Consider that many cyberattacks are similar to actual warfare attacks. The more the attacker knows about the targeted enemy, the more effectively a plan of attack can be crafted.

      Defending against eliciting information events generally involves the same precautions as those used against social engineering. Those include classifying information, controlling the movement of sensitive data, watching for attempted abuses, training personnel, and reporting any suspicious activity to the security team.

      Prepending

      Prepending is the adding of a term, expression, or phrase to the beginning or header of some other communication. Often prepending is used in order to further refine or establish the pretext of a social engineering attack, such as spam, hoaxes, and phishing. An attacker can precede the subject of an attack message with RE: or FW: (which indicates “in regard to and forwarded,” respectively) to make the receiver think the communication is the continuance of a previous conversation rather than the first contact of an attack. Other often-used prepending terms are EXTERNAL, PRIVATE, and INTERNAL.

      Prepending attacks can also be used to fool filters, such as spam filters, antimalware, firewalls, and intrusion detection systems (IDSs). This could be accomplished with SAFE, FILTERED, AUTHORIZED, VERIFIED, CONFIRMED, or APPROVED, among others. It might even be possible to interject alternate email header values, such as “X-Spam-Category: LEGIT” or “X-Spam-Condition: SAFE,” which could fool spam and abuse filters.

      Phishing

      Attackers send phishing emails indiscriminately as spam, without knowing who will get them but in the hope that some users will respond. Phishing emails sometimes inform the user of a bogus problem and say that if the user doesn't take action, the company will lock the user's account. The From email address is often spoofed to look legitimate, but the Reply To email address is an account controlled by the attacker. Sophisticated attacks include a link to a bogus website that looks legitimate but that captures credentials and passes them to the attacker.

      Sometimes the goal of phishing is to install malware on user systems. The message may include an infected file attachment or a link to a website that installs a malicious drive-by download without the user's knowledge.

      

A drive-by download is a type of malware that installs itself without the user's knowledge when the user visits a website. Drive-by downloads take advantage of vulnerabilities in browsers or plug-ins.

      To defend against phishing attacks, end users should be trained to do the following:

       Be suspicious of unexpected email messages, or email messages from unknown senders.

       Never open unexpected email attachments.

       Never share sensitive information via email.

       Avoid clicking any link received via email, instant messaging, or a social network message.

      If a message claims to be from a known source, such as a website commonly visited, the user should visit the supposed site by using a preestablished bookmark or by searching for the site by name. If, after accessing their account on the site, a duplicate message does not appear in the online messaging or alert system, the original message is likely an attack or a fake. Any such false communications should be reported to the targeted organization, and then the message should be deleted. If the attack relates to your organization or employer, it should be reported to the security team there as well.

      Organizations should consider the consequences and increased risk that granting workers access to personal email and social networks through company systems pose. Some companies have elected to block access to personal internet communications while using company equipment or through company-controlled network connections. This reduces the risk to the organization even if an individual succumbs to a phishing attack on their own.

      A phishing simulation is a tool used to evaluate the ability of employees to resist or fall for a phishing campaign. A security manager or penetration tester crafts a phishing attack so that any clicks by victims are redirected to a notification that the phishing message was a simulation and they may need to attend additional training to avoid falling for a real attack.

      Spear Phishing

      Spear phishing is a more targeted form of phishing where the message is crafted and directed specifically to a group of individuals. Often, attackers use a stolen customer database to send false messages crafted to seem like a communication from the compromised business but with falsified source addresses and incorrect URI/URLs. The hope of the attacker is that someone who already has an online/digital relationship with an organization is more likely to fall for the false communication.

      All of the concepts and defenses discussed in the previous section, “Phishing,” apply to spear phishing.

      Spear phishing can also be crafted to seem as if it originated from a CEO or other top office in an organization. This version of spear phishing is often call business email compromise (BEC). BEC is often focused on convincing members of accounting or financial departments to transfer funds or pay invoices based on instructions seeming to originate from a boss, manager, or executive. BEC has defrauded organizations of billions of dollars in the last few years. BEC is also known as CEO fraud or CEO spoofing.

      As with most forms of social engineering, defenses for spear phishing require the following:

       Labeling information, data, and assets with their value, importance, or sensitivity

       Training personnel on proper handling of those assets based on their labels

       Requesting clarification or confirmation on any actions that seem abnormal, off-process, or otherwise overly risky to the organization

      Some abusive concepts to watch out for are requests to pay bills or invoices using prepaid gift cards, changes to wiring details (especially at the last minute), or requests to purchase products that are atypical for the requester and that are needed in a rush. When seeking to confirm a suspected BEC, do not use the same communication medium that the BEC used. Make a phone call, go to their office, text-message their cell phone, or use the company-approved internal messaging service. Establishing a second “out-of-band” contact with the requester will further confirm whether the message is legitimate or false.

      Whaling

Скачать книгу