Скачать книгу

work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      4. Is the scope of Community health services defined?

      <--- Score

      5. How would you define Community health services leadership?

      <--- Score

      6. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      7. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      8. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      9. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      10. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      11. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      12. How have you defined all Community health services requirements first?

      <--- Score

      13. What are the Community health services tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      14. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      15. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Community health services results are met?

      <--- Score

      16. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      17. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      18. What Community health services requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      19. Are accountability and ownership for Community health services clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      20. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      21. Has a Community health services requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      22. Is the Community health services scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you catch Community health services definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      24. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      25. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      26. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      27. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      28. What sources do you use to gather information for a Community health services study?

      <--- Score

      29. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      30. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      31. What are the record-keeping requirements of Community health services activities?

      <--- Score

      32. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      33. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Community health services? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      34. How can the value of Community health services be defined?

      <--- Score

      35. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      36. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      37. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      39. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      40. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      41. Is Community health services required?

      <--- Score

      42. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      43. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      44. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      45. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      46. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      47. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      48. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      49. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Community health services work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      50. Is there a critical path to deliver Community health services results?

      <--- Score

      51. Is there a clear Community health services case definition?

      <--- Score

      52. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      53. Will a Community health services production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      54. Are the Community health services requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      55. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      56. Why are you doing Community health services and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      57. What would be the goal or target for a Community health services’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      58. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <---

Скачать книгу