LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Score

      14. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      15. Will team members perform Capability security work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      16. How did the Capability security manager receive input to the development of a Capability security improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      17. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      18. What happens if Capability security’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      19. What are the record-keeping requirements of Capability security activities?

      <--- Score

      20. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      21. Has the Capability security work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      22. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      23. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      25. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      26. How can the value of Capability security be defined?

      <--- Score

      27. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      28. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      29. Do you all define Capability security in the same way?

      <--- Score

      30. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      31. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      32. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      33. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      34. What are the core elements of the Capability security business case?

      <--- Score

      35. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      36. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      37. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      38. What would be the goal or target for a Capability security’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      39. What are the Capability security use cases?

      <--- Score

      40. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      41. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Capability security changes?

      <--- Score

      42. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      43. What is the scope of Capability security?

      <--- Score

      44. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      45. What system do you use for gathering Capability security information?

      <--- Score

      46. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      47. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      48. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      49. Are the Capability security requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      50. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      51. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      52. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      53. Who are the Capability security improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      54. Will team members regularly document their Capability security work?

      <--- Score

      55. What are the Capability security tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      56. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Capability security? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      57. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      58. Is Capability security linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      59. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      61. Who is gathering Capability security information?

      <--- Score

      62. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      63. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      65. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      66. Is the scope of Capability security defined?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you catch Capability security definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      68. How do you manage changes in Capability security requirements?

      <--- Score

      69. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      70. What critical

Скачать книгу