LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Score

      7. How does the Electronic system level manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      8. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      9. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      10. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      11. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      12. Is there a critical path to deliver Electronic system level results?

      <--- Score

      13. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      14. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      15. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      16. How do you catch Electronic system level definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      17. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      18. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      19. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      20. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      21. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      22. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      23. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      24. Is the Electronic system level scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      25. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      26. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      27. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      28. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      29. How can the value of Electronic system level be defined?

      <--- Score

      30. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      31. What happens if Electronic system level’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      32. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Electronic system level?

      <--- Score

      33. What are (control) requirements for Electronic system level Information?

      <--- Score

      34. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      35. Who approved the Electronic system level scope?

      <--- Score

      36. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      37. Is the scope of Electronic system level defined?

      <--- Score

      38. How will the Electronic system level team and the group measure complete success of Electronic system level?

      <--- Score

      39. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Electronic system level goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      40. How do you hand over Electronic system level context?

      <--- Score

      41. Is there any additional Electronic system level definition of success?

      <--- Score

      42. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      43. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      44. Is Electronic system level currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      45. Is there a Electronic system level management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      46. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      47. How did the Electronic system level manager receive input to the development of a Electronic system level improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      48. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      49. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      50. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      51. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Electronic system level brings?

      <--- Score

      52. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      53. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Electronic system level leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      54. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      55. Has the Electronic system level work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      56. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      57. Are accountability and ownership for Electronic system level clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      58. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      59. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      60. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      61. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <---

Скачать книгу