LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      6. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      7. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      8. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      9. Is there a critical path to deliver Critical Process Parameters results?

      <--- Score

      10. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      11. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      12. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      13. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      14. What are the record-keeping requirements of Critical Process Parameters activities?

      <--- Score

      15. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      16. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      17. Who approved the Critical Process Parameters scope?

      <--- Score

      18. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      19. What are (control) requirements for Critical Process Parameters Information?

      <--- Score

      20. What is the scope of the Critical Process Parameters work?

      <--- Score

      21. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      22. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      23. What Critical Process Parameters requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      24. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Critical Process Parameters? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      25. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      26. What would be the goal or target for a Critical Process Parameters’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      27. Is Critical Process Parameters required?

      <--- Score

      28. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      29. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      30. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      31. Do you have a Critical Process Parameters success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      32. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      33. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      34. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      35. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      36. What sources do you use to gather information for a Critical Process Parameters study?

      <--- Score

      37. What is the scope of the Critical Process Parameters effort?

      <--- Score

      38. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      39. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      40. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      41. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      42. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      43. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      44. When is/was the Critical Process Parameters start date?

      <--- Score

      45. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      46. Is the scope of Critical Process Parameters defined?

      <--- Score

      47. Have all basic functions of Critical Process Parameters been defined?

      <--- Score

      48. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      49. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      50. Is there any additional Critical Process Parameters definition of success?

      <--- Score

      51. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      52. How would you define Critical Process Parameters leadership?

      <--- Score

      53. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      54. Is the Critical Process Parameters scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      55. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Critical Process Parameters leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      56. Who is gathering Critical Process Parameters information?

      <--- Score

      57. Do you all define Critical Process Parameters in the same way?

      <--- Score

      58. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      59. Is there a Critical Process Parameters management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      60. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      61. Are there different segments of customers?

      <---

Скачать книгу