LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Is special Design Engineering and Construction Services user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      51. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      52. How are consistent Design Engineering and Construction Services definitions important?

      <--- Score

      53. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      54. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      55. Is there a Design Engineering and Construction Services management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      56. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      57. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Design Engineering and Construction Services results are met?

      <--- Score

      58. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      59. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      60. What would be the goal or target for a Design Engineering and Construction Services’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      61. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      62. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      63. Who is gathering Design Engineering and Construction Services information?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      65. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      66. Will team members regularly document their Design Engineering and Construction Services work?

      <--- Score

      67. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      68. What is the scope of the Design Engineering and Construction Services effort?

      <--- Score

      69. Is there any additional Design Engineering and Construction Services definition of success?

      <--- Score

      70. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      71. Is Design Engineering and Construction Services linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      72. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Design Engineering and Construction Services work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      73. Are the Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      74. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      75. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      76. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      77. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      78. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      79. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you gather Design Engineering and Construction Services requirements?

      <--- Score

      81. Have all basic functions of Design Engineering and Construction Services been defined?

      <--- Score

      82. How can the value of Design Engineering and Construction Services be defined?

      <--- Score

      83. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      84. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      85. What are (control) requirements for Design Engineering and Construction Services Information?

      <--- Score

      86. Do you have a Design Engineering and Construction Services success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      87. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      88. Is the Design Engineering and Construction Services scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      89. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      90. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      91. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      92. What are the Design Engineering and Construction Services use cases?

      <--- Score

      93. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      94. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      95. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      96. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      97. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      98. What happens if Design Engineering and Construction Services’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      99. What sources do you use to gather information for a Design Engineering and Construction Services study?

      <--- Score

      100. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      101. Is there a clear Design Engineering and Construction Services case definition?

      <---

Скачать книгу