LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

record-keeping requirements of Administrative review activities?

      <--- Score

      8. What are the core elements of the Administrative review business case?

      <--- Score

      9. How do you catch Administrative review definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      10. Is Administrative review required?

      <--- Score

      11. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      12. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      13. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      14. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      15. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      16. How are consistent Administrative review definitions important?

      <--- Score

      17. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      18. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      19. What are (control) requirements for Administrative review Information?

      <--- Score

      20. Is special Administrative review user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      21. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      22. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      23. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      24. How can the value of Administrative review be defined?

      <--- Score

      25. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      26. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Administrative review? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      27. Who is gathering Administrative review information?

      <--- Score

      28. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      29. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      30. Will team members perform Administrative review work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      31. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      32. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      33. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      34. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      35. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      36. What would be the goal or target for a Administrative review’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      37. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      38. What sources do you use to gather information for a Administrative review study?

      <--- Score

      39. How have you defined all Administrative review requirements first?

      <--- Score

      40. Who approved the Administrative review scope?

      <--- Score

      41. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      42. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      43. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      44. Why are you doing Administrative review and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      45. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Administrative review goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      46. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      47. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      48. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Administrative review changes?

      <--- Score

      49. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      50. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Administrative review brings?

      <--- Score

      51. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Administrative review?

      <--- Score

      52. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      53. Is Administrative review currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      54. How will the Administrative review team and the group measure complete success of Administrative review?

      <--- Score

      55. Is the Administrative review scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      56. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      57. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      58. How does the Administrative review manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      59. Are the Administrative review requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the State administrative review requirements for school food authorities and organizations?

      <--- Score

      61. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      62. What Administrative review services do you require?

      <--- Score

      63.

Скачать книгу