LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      53. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      54. Has a Emergency communication systems requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      55. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      56. Will a Emergency communication systems production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      57. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      58. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      59. Is special Emergency communication systems user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      60. How would you define Emergency communication systems leadership?

      <--- Score

      61. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      62. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      63. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      64. How did the Emergency communication systems manager receive input to the development of a Emergency communication systems improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      65. Do you all define Emergency communication systems in the same way?

      <--- Score

      66. What sources do you use to gather information for a Emergency communication systems study?

      <--- Score

      67. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      68. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      69. Has the Emergency communication systems work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      70. Are the Emergency communication systems requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      71. What happens if Emergency communication systems’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      72. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      73. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      74. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      75. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      76. Is there a critical path to deliver Emergency communication systems results?

      <--- Score

      77. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      78. How does the Emergency communication systems manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      79. Are improvement team members fully trained on Emergency communication systems?

      <--- Score

      80. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      81. How do you think the partners involved in Emergency communication systems would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      82. Will team members regularly document their Emergency communication systems work?

      <--- Score

      83. How do you manage changes in Emergency communication systems requirements?

      <--- Score

      84. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      85. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Emergency communication systems leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      86. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      87. Is the Emergency communication systems scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      88. What is the definition of Emergency communication systems excellence?

      <--- Score

      89. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Emergency communication systems?

      <--- Score

      90. Is there a Emergency communication systems management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      91. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Emergency communication systems brings?

      <--- Score

      92. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      93. Is the scope of Emergency communication systems defined?

      <--- Score

      94. What are the core elements of the Emergency communication systems business case?

      <--- Score

      95. Is the Emergency communication systems scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      96. What Emergency communication systems requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      97. Who are the Emergency communication systems improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      98. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      99. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      100. What is the scope of the Emergency communication systems effort?

      <--- Score

      101. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      102. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      103. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      104. What system do you use for gathering Emergency communication systems information?

      <--- Score

      105. Is Emergency communication systems required?

      <---

Скачать книгу