LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      9. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      10. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      11. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      12. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      13. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      14. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      15. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      16. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      17. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      18. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      19. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      20. Is Transportation Security currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      21. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      22. Will team members regularly document their Transportation Security work?

      <--- Score

      23. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      24. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      25. What is the scope of Transportation Security?

      <--- Score

      26. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      27. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Transportation Security goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      28. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      29. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      30. What is the definition of Transportation Security excellence?

      <--- Score

      31. What would be the goal or target for a Transportation Security’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      32. Is there a Transportation Security management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      33. Will a Transportation Security production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      34. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      35. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      36. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      37. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      38. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      39. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      40. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      41. Is there any additional Transportation Security definition of success?

      <--- Score

      42. Are the Transportation Security requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      43. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      44. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      45. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      46. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      47. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      48. Is the Transportation Security scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      49. How have you defined all Transportation Security requirements first?

      <--- Score

      50. How do you hand over Transportation Security context?

      <--- Score

      51. Is Transportation Security required?

      <--- Score

      52. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      53. Has the Transportation Security work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      54. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Transportation Security work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      55. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      56. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Transportation Security leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      57. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      58. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      59. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      60. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Transportation Security results are met?

      <--- Score

      61. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      62. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      63. What are the Transportation Security use cases?

      <---

Скачать книгу