LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

      14. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      15. Is there a clear Source coding case definition?

      <--- Score

      16. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      17. What are the Source coding tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      18. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      19. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      20. Is there any additional Source coding definition of success?

      <--- Score

      21. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      22. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      23. Has a Source coding requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      24. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      25. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      26. Have all basic functions of Source coding been defined?

      <--- Score

      27. How do you catch Source coding definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      28. What happens if Source coding’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      29. What would be the goal or target for a Source coding’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      30. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Source coding work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      31. Is the scope of Source coding defined?

      <--- Score

      32. Is the Source coding scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      33. Is the Source coding scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      34. What are the record-keeping requirements of Source coding activities?

      <--- Score

      35. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      36. How can the value of Source coding be defined?

      <--- Score

      37. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      38. Has the Source coding work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      39. When is/was the Source coding start date?

      <--- Score

      40. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Source coding goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      41. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      42. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      43. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      44. What are the core elements of the Source coding business case?

      <--- Score

      45. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      46. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      47. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      48. How do you manage unclear Source coding requirements?

      <--- Score

      49. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      50. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      51. Is Source coding required?

      <--- Score

      52. Who is gathering Source coding information?

      <--- Score

      53. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      54. What is the scope of the Source coding work?

      <--- Score

      55. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      56. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      57. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Source coding leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      58. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      59. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      60. How do you think the partners involved in Source coding would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      61. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      62. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      63. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      64. Do you have a Source coding success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      65. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      66. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      67. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      68. What are the Source coding use cases?

      <--- Score

      69. How does the Source coding manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      70. How did the Source coding manager receive input to the development of a Source coding improvement

Скачать книгу