LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Score

      68. What would be the goal or target for a Social learning tools’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      69. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      70. When is/was the Social learning tools start date?

      <--- Score

      71. Are improvement team members fully trained on Social learning tools?

      <--- Score

      72. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      73. What sources do you use to gather information for a Social learning tools study?

      <--- Score

      74. Who are the Social learning tools improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      75. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      76. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Social learning tools leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      77. How will the Social learning tools team and the group measure complete success of Social learning tools?

      <--- Score

      78. How does the Social learning tools manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      79. How do you think the partners involved in Social learning tools would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      80. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      81. Is Social learning tools linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      82. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      83. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      84. How would you define Social learning tools leadership?

      <--- Score

      85. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      86. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      87. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      88. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Social learning tools? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      89. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      90. Is there a critical path to deliver Social learning tools results?

      <--- Score

      91. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      92. Is there any additional Social learning tools definition of success?

      <--- Score

      93. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      94. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      95. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Social learning tools?

      <--- Score

      96. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      97. How can the value of Social learning tools be defined?

      <--- Score

      98. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      99. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      100. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      101. Is there a Social learning tools management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      102. How did the Social learning tools manager receive input to the development of a Social learning tools improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      103. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      104. Have all basic functions of Social learning tools been defined?

      <--- Score

      105. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      106. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Social learning tools goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      107. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      108. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      109. Are the Social learning tools requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      110. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      111. Do you all define Social learning tools in the same way?

      <--- Score

      112. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      113. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      114. What is the scope of Social learning tools?

      <--- Score

      115. How do you manage changes in Social learning tools requirements?

      <--- Score

      116. How do you hand over Social learning tools context?

      <--- Score

      117. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      118. Who is gathering Social learning tools information?

      <--- Score

      119. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      120. Is Social learning tools currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      121. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

Скачать книгу