Скачать книгу

Score

      11. What is the scope of the Social learning tools effort?

      <--- Score

      12. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      13. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      14. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      15. Why are you doing Social learning tools and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      16. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      17. Is the scope of Social learning tools defined?

      <--- Score

      18. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      19. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      20. Is Social learning tools required?

      <--- Score

      21. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      22. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      23. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      24. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Social learning tools work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      25. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      26. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Social learning tools brings?

      <--- Score

      27. What is the definition of Social learning tools excellence?

      <--- Score

      28. What Social learning tools requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      29. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      30. What are the Social learning tools tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      31. How have you defined all Social learning tools requirements first?

      <--- Score

      32. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      33. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?

      <--- Score

      34. Who approved the Social learning tools scope?

      <--- Score

      35. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      36. Will team members perform Social learning tools work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      37. Is the Social learning tools scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      38. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      39. What are the record-keeping requirements of Social learning tools activities?

      <--- Score

      40. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      41. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      42. How are consistent Social learning tools definitions important?

      <--- Score

      43. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      44. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      45. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      46. Are team charters developed?

      <--- Score

      47. Is special Social learning tools user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      48. What Social learning tools services do you require?

      <--- Score

      49. What happens if Social learning tools’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      50. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      51. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      52. Is there a clear Social learning tools case definition?

      <--- Score

      53. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      54. Is the Social learning tools scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      55. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      56. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      57. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      58. What are the core elements of the Social learning tools business case?

      <--- Score

      59. How do you gather Social learning tools requirements?

      <--- Score

      60. Are the Social learning tools requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      61. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      62. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      63. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      65. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      66. Will a Social learning tools production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      67. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <---

Скачать книгу