LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Safety Integrity Level manager receive input to the development of a Automotive Safety Integrity Level improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      64. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      65. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      66. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you catch Automotive Safety Integrity Level definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      69. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      70. How would you define Automotive Safety Integrity Level leadership?

      <--- Score

      71. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      72. What is the scope of the Automotive Safety Integrity Level effort?

      <--- Score

      73. What Automotive Safety Integrity Level services do you require?

      <--- Score

      74. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      75. Are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      76. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      77. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      78. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      79. Are complex designs required for safety?

      <--- Score

      80. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      81. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the definition of Automotive Safety Integrity Level excellence?

      <--- Score

      83. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      84. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      85. What is the scope of Automotive Safety Integrity Level?

      <--- Score

      86. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      87. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      88. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      89. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      90. How do you keep the different kinds of safety-related requirements consistent?

      <--- Score

      91. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      92. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      93. What system do you use for gathering Automotive Safety Integrity Level information?

      <--- Score

      94. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      95. How do you think the partners involved in Automotive Safety Integrity Level would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      96. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      97. Who are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      98. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      99. What are the enforcement methods used by regulators under the safety case?

      <--- Score

      100. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      101. Has the Automotive Safety Integrity Level work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      102. Does system satisfy technical system safety requirements?

      <--- Score

      103. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      104. Is there a clear Automotive Safety Integrity Level case definition?

      <--- Score

      105. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Automotive Safety Integrity Level results are met?

      <--- Score

      106. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      107. Is there a Automotive Safety Integrity Level management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      108. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      109. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      110. How does the Automotive Safety Integrity Level manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      111. What sources do you use to gather information for a Automotive Safety Integrity Level study?

      <--- Score

      112. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      113. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automotive Safety Integrity Level? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      114. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      116.

Скачать книгу