LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

      9. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      10. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      11. Is the Automotive Safety Integrity Level scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      12. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      13. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Automotive Safety Integrity Level leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      14. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Automotive Safety Integrity Level brings?

      <--- Score

      15. What are the Automotive Safety Integrity Level tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      16. Is special Automotive Safety Integrity Level user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      17. What happens if Automotive Safety Integrity Level’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      18. How to reconcile seemingly conflicting requirements of safety and efficiency?

      <--- Score

      19. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      20. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      21. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      22. Will a Automotive Safety Integrity Level production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      23. Have all basic functions of Automotive Safety Integrity Level been defined?

      <--- Score

      24. What would be the goal or target for a Automotive Safety Integrity Level’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      25. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      26. Why is the minimum distance (safety distance) required and which factors play a role here?

      <--- Score

      27. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      28. Who has to be charged as responsible in case of an accident?

      <--- Score

      29. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      30. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      31. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      32. When is/was the Automotive Safety Integrity Level start date?

      <--- Score

      33. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      34. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      35. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Automotive Safety Integrity Level?

      <--- Score

      36. What are (control) requirements for Automotive Safety Integrity Level Information?

      <--- Score

      37. How do you manage changes in Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      39. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      40. Why are you doing Automotive Safety Integrity Level and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      41. What are the core elements of the Automotive Safety Integrity Level business case?

      <--- Score

      42. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      43. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      44. Are accountability and ownership for Automotive Safety Integrity Level clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      45. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      46. Is it true that the safety case regulatory approach leads to self-regulation by industry?

      <--- Score

      47. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      48. Is Automotive Safety Integrity Level currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      49. How are consistent Automotive Safety Integrity Level definitions important?

      <--- Score

      50. Is the scope of Automotive Safety Integrity Level defined?

      <--- Score

      51. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      52. How do you hand over Automotive Safety Integrity Level context?

      <--- Score

      53. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      54. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      55. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      56. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      57. How do you gather Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements?

      <--- Score

      58. What Automotive Safety Integrity Level requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      59. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      60. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      61. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      62. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      63. How

Скачать книгу