Скачать книгу

Score

      66. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      67. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      68. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      69. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      70. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Security Administration brings?

      <--- Score

      71. What happens if Security Administration’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      72. How do you gather Security Administration requirements?

      <--- Score

      73. What is the definition of Security Administration excellence?

      <--- Score

      74. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      75. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      76. Who are the Security Administration improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      77. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      78. What Security Administration services do you require?

      <--- Score

      79. Is the Security Administration scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      80. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      81. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      82. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      83. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      84. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      85. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Security Administration goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      86. What are the Security Administration use cases?

      <--- Score

      87. How does the Security Administration manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      88. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      89. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      90. Are accountability and ownership for Security Administration clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      91. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      92. What are the Security Administration tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      93. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      94. Will team members regularly document their Security Administration work?

      <--- Score

      95. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      96. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      97. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      98. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      99. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      100. Do you have a Security Administration success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      101. What is the scope of the Security Administration work?

      <--- Score

      102. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      103. Will a Security Administration production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      104. How have you defined all Security Administration requirements first?

      <--- Score

      105. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      106. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      107. Who is gathering Security Administration information?

      <--- Score

      108. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Security Administration results are met?

      <--- Score

      109. Has a Security Administration requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      110. Are the Security Administration requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      111. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      112. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      113. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      114. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      115. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      116. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      117. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      118. How can the value of Security Administration be defined?

      <--- Score

      119. What system do you use for gathering Security Administration information?

      <--- Score

      120. How do you think the partners involved in Security Administration would have defined

Скачать книгу