LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

of the superficial form and colours may be elaborated; but the marble peach feels cold and heavy, and children only put it to their mouths. We find no difficulty in admitting as excellent, and the legitimate language of poetic fervour self-impassioned, Donne’s apostrophe to the Sun in the second stanza of his PROGRESS OF THE SOUL.

      “Thee, eye of heaven! this great Soul envies not;

      By thy male force is all, we have, begot.

      In the first East thou now beginn’st to shine,

      Suck’st early balm and island spices there,

      And wilt anon in thy loose-rein’d career

      At Tagus, Po, Seine, Thames, and Danow dine,

      And see at night this western world of mine:

      Yet hast thou not more nations seen than she,

      Who before thee one day began to be,

      And, thy frail light being quench’d, shall long, long outlive

      thee.”

      Or the next stanza but one:

      “Great Destiny, the commissary of God,

      That hast mark’d out a path and period

      For every thing! Who, where we offspring took,

      Our ways and ends see’st at one instant: thou

      Knot of all causes! Thou, whose changeless brow

      Ne’er smiles nor frowns! O! vouchsafe thou to look,

      And shew my story in thy eternal book,” etc.

      

      As little difficulty do we find in excluding from the honours of unaffected warmth and elevation the madness prepense of pseudopoesy, or the startling hysteric of weakness over-exerting itself, which bursts on the unprepared reader in sundry odes and apostrophes to abstract terms. Such are the Odes to jealousy, to Hope, to Oblivion, and the like, in Dodsley’s collection and the magazines of that day, which seldom fail to remind me of an Oxford copy of verses on the two SUTTONS, commencing with

      “Inoculation, heavenly maid! descend!”

      It is not to be denied that men of undoubted talents, and even poets of true, though not of first-rate, genius, have from a mistaken theory deluded both themselves and others in the opposite extreme. I once read to a company of sensible and well-educated women the introductory period of Cowley’s preface to his “Pindaric Odes,” written in imitation of the style and manner of the odes of Pindar. “If,” (says Cowley), “a man should undertake to translate Pindar, word for word, it would be thought that one madman had translated another as may appear, when he, that understands not the original, reads the verbal traduction of him into Latin prose, than which nothing seems more raving.” I then proceeded with his own free version of the second Olympic, composed for the charitable purpose of rationalizing the Theban Eagle.

      “Queen of all harmonious things,

      Dancing words and speaking strings,

      What god, what hero, wilt thou sing?

      What happy man to equal glories bring?

      Begin, begin thy noble choice,

      And let the hills around reflect the image of thy voice.

      Pisa does to Jove belong,

      Jove and Pisa claim thy song.

      The fair first-fruits of war, th’ Olympic games,

      Alcides, offer’d up to Jove;

      Alcides, too, thy strings may move,

      But, oh! what man to join with these can worthy prove?

      Join Theron boldly to their sacred names;

      Theron the next honour claims;

      Theron to no man gives place,

      Is first in Pisa’s and in Virtue’s race;

      Theron there, and he alone,

      Ev’n his own swift forefathers has outgone.”

      One of the company exclaimed, with the full assent of the rest, that if the original were madder than this, it must be incurably mad. I then translated the ode from the Greek, and as nearly as possible, word for word; and the impression was, that in the general movement of the periods, in the form of the connections and transitions, and in the sober majesty of lofty sense, it appeared to them to approach more nearly, than any other poetry they had heard, to the style of our Bible, in the prophetic books. The first strophe will suffice as a specimen:

      “Ye harp-controlling hymns! (or) ye hymns the sovereigns of harps!

      What God? what Hero?

      What Man shall we celebrate?

      Truly Pisa indeed is of Jove,

      But the Olympiad (or the Olympic games) did Hercules establish,

      The first-fruits of the spoils of war.

      But Theron for the four-horsed car,

      That bore victory to him,

      It behoves us now to voice aloud:

      The Just, the Hospitable,

      The Bulwark of Agrigentum,

      Of renowned fathers

      The Flower, even him

      Who preserves his native city erect and safe.”

      But are such rhetorical caprices condemnable only for their deviation from the language of real life? and are they by no other means to be precluded, but by the rejection of all distinctions between prose and verse, save that of metre? Surely good sense, and a moderate insight into the constitution of the human mind, would be amply sufficient to prove, that such language and such combinations are the native product neither of the fancy nor of the imagination; that their operation consists in the excitement of surprise by the juxtaposition and apparent reconciliation of widely different or incompatible things. As when, for instance, the hills are made to reflect the image of a voice. Surely, no unusual taste is requisite to see clearly, that this compulsory juxtaposition is not produced by the presentation of impressive or delightful forms to the inward vision, nor by any sympathy with the modifying powers with which the genius of the poet had united and inspirited all the objects of his thought; that it is therefore a species of wit, a pure work of the will, and implies a leisure and self-possession both of thought and of feeling, incompatible with the steady fervour of a mind possessed and filled with the grandeur of its subject. To sum up the whole in one sentence. When a poem, or a part of a poem, shall be adduced, which is evidently vicious in the figures and centexture of its style, yet for the condemnation of which no reason can be assigned, except that it differs from the style in which men actually converse, then, and not till then, can I hold this theory to be either plausible, or practicable, or capable of furnishing either rule, guidance, or precaution, that might not, more easily and more safely, as well as more naturally, have been deduced in the author’s own mind from considerations of grammar, logic, and the truth and nature of things, confirmed by the authority of works, whose fame is not of one country nor of one age.

CHAPTER XIX

       Table of Contents

      Continuation — Concerning the real object which, it is probable, Mr. Wordsworth had before him in his critical preface — Elucidation and application of this.

      It might appear from some passages in the former part of Mr. Wordsworth’s preface, that he meant to confine his theory of style, and the necessity of a close accordance with the actual language of men, to those particular subjects from low and rustic life,

Скачать книгу