Скачать книгу

in the University College Day Celebration was one of the activities that played a major role in deepening students’ socio‐political consciousness after the attempted coup. The first three poems in the ranking were awarded by the Emperor and read at the events. In 1961, because the Emperor was not happy with the poems’ messages that were politically engaged, he suspended the students from their studies. This caused tensions between the “palace” and the “campus.”

      The novels written between the 1960 aborted coup and the 1974 revolution are enlightened by this kind of revelation. Haddis Alemayehu’s Fiqir Iske Meqabir (Love unto Death), Berhanu Zerihun’s YeTewodros Inba (Tewodros’ Tears), and especially Dagniachew Worku’s Adefris (Trouble Maker), Be’alu Girma’s Ke’admas Bashagger (Beyond the Horizon), and Sibhat Gebre‐Igziabhier’s Letum Aynegalgn (The Night Never Ends for Me) hold tension between opposites – hope and despair. Though they desire change and proclaim renaissance, they have lost hope because of the confusion and anarchy created as a result of extremism and radicalism. Adefris, Ke’admas, and Letum, with their subversive manner of representation, are self‐reflective novels that deconstruct the past Ethiopian national imagery while critically engaging their own generation’s self‐destructive, nihilistic, self‐aggrandizing ego.

      In Adefris, key natural, cultural, and historical components of the national imaginary are unsympathetically disfigured. The entire setting where the story takes place is described thus: “it looks like the storage where God dumped the junk that was left after He completed creating the rest of the world” (Worku 1970, 5). This place, however, is the birthplace of the female characters that represent ancient and modern Ethiopia – Tsione and Roman (connoting Zion and Rome respectively). The characters that represent the three major institutions – education, justice, and religion – are sent here for national service. In this place, which is a microcosm of Ethiopia, religion and history are subject to decadence. The way all the “great” kings are selected and listed sequentially in the novel, starting with Ezana of Aksum to Menelik of Adwa, is not usual. Their usual divine grace is absent. They go hand‐in‐hand with the commons and become part of the crowd by the use of a dash (–). What is worse, they have been swallowed up in an abyss just like the rest of life that is covered with dust and swamped with silt.

      In Letum, Gebre‐Igziabhier escalates Worku’s decadence to cosmic decay. All the sacred secrets and religious ceremonies are satirically ridiculed. Ethiopia’s three thousand years of history have become sexualized. The young rebels make a mockery of their forefathers’ victory by comparing it to the “sexual victory” that had taken place in brothels. In Letum, the main imagery is filled with dislikable paints, designs, movements, situations, noises, and smells. In Ke’admas, we can think of the main character, Abera, as an embodiment of the hope and despair of the generation, and his cluttered house – the big, soundless radiogram that looks like a coffin, a painting bereft of beauty, curtains with black and golden lace, dark blood‐red color couches and carpet – as the country.

      The 1957 publication of Be’imnet Gebre‐Amlak’s well‐crafted novel, Lijjinnet Temelliso Ayimetam (Childhood Never Returns), with its remarkable setting, plot, and characterization, is an aesthetic imperative of Alemayehu’s thesis. In this novel, there are three characters of the same age whose education choices are picked by their parents. The man from a family that resents modern education and who spends his years in traditional school ends up being a beggar because he cannot cope with life. The family that ridicules traditional education and puts their child in missionary school sees their child become a drug addict. The third character, Berhanu Abbay, establishes his identity in a traditional education system at an early age and then acquires modern education. Berhanu is the incarnation of harmony envisioned by Alemayehu and Gebre‐Amlak.

      Unfortunately, the state’s disregard of such advice and its uncritical imposition of western education created cultural dislocation and confusion. As a result, we witnessed student radicalism, nihilism, anarchism, and absurdism in the late 1960s and early 1970s. This national‐generational predicament is what the novels portray in a concrete fashion. In Ke’admas, Abera questions himself while staring at the essenceless painting: “Who am I? What am I? – who decided that I become this thing? Me, myself? Or the society that raised me? Or the education institution that I passed through? What education institution! What would be the purpose of the institution? To skim through like a race! For what purpose! The purpose of education was to help everyone find one’s identity and talent. Who am I?” (Girma 2007, 7, italics added). As Abera has told us, “this thing” is a manifestation of his generation’s state of being and mind. He is “a worthless decayed thing” (8), “a putrid cabbage” (84), and “a chicken seated on a rotten egg … what is surprising is that he doesn’t even sense this bad odor” (126).

Скачать книгу