LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

stick. We must confess, however, that from the despair and death of Shiptonia, to the battle of Hastings, in which ROLLO kills with his own hand the Saxon Drummer, and carries off his wife, the Poem abounds with beautiful details, cold-blooded matter of facts. Critics may perhaps object that it appears from the Genealogy of the Rollos, Duke ROLLO came to England more than 60 years before the battle of Hastings: though the Poet represents him as the principal hero in that memorable engagement. But such deviations from history are among the common licences of poetry. Thus Virgil, for the sake of a beautiful episode, makes Dido live in the time of Æneas, whereas she lived in reality 200 years before the Trojan war; and if authority more in point be desired, Mr. Cumberland wrote a Tragedy, called the Battle of Hastings, in which there was not a single event, except the death of Harold, that had the slightest foundation in historical facts, or even probability.

      But the sixth book, in which ROLLO, almost despairing of success, descends into a Night Cellar to consult the illustrious MERLIN on his future destiny, is a master-piece of elegance. In this book, as the Philosopher’s magic lantern exhibits the characters of all ROLLO’s descendants, and even all those who are to act on the same stage with the Marcellus of the piece, the present illustrious Mr. ROLLE, we mean to select in our next number some of the most striking passages of this inexhaustible Magazine of Poetry!

      * * * * *

       NUMBER II.

      Our author, after giving an account of the immediate descendants of ROLLO, finds himself considerably embarrassed by the three unfortunate ROLLOS[1], whom history relates to have been hanged. From this difficulty, however, he relieves himself, by a contrivance equally new and arduous, viz. by versifying the bill of indictment, and inserting in it a flaw, by which they are saved from condemnation. But in the transactions of those early times, however dignified the phraseology, and enlivened by fancy, there is little to amaze and less to interest; let us hasten, therefore, to those characters about whom not to be solicitous, is to want curiosity, and whom not to admire, is to want gratitude—to those characters, in short, whose splendour illuminates the present House of Commons.

      Of these, our author’s principal favourite appears to be that amiable[2] young Nobleman, whose Diary we have all perused with so much pleasure. Of him he says—

      ———Superior to abuse,

       He nobly glories in the name of GOOSE;

       Such Geese at Rome from the perfidious Gaul

       Preserv’d the Treas’ry-Bench and Capitol, &c. &c.

      In the description of Lord MAHON, our author departs a little from his wonted gravity—

      ———This Quixote of the Nation,

       Beats his own Windmills in gesticulation,

       To Strike, not please, his utmost force he bends, And all his sense is at his fingers ends, &c. &c.

      But the most beautiful effort of our author’s genius (if we except only the character of Mr. ROLLE himself) is contained in the description of Mr. PITT.

      Pert without fire, without experience sage,

       Young with more art than SHELBURNE glean’d from age,

       loo proud from pilfer’d greatness to descend,

       Too humble not to call DUNDAS his friend,

       In solemn dignity and sullen state,

       This new Octavius rises to debate!

       Mild and more mild he sees each placid row

       Of Country Gentlemen with rapture glow;

       He sees, convuls’d with sympathetic throbs,

       Apprentice Peers, and deputy Nabobs!

       Nor Rum Contractors think his speech too long,

       While words, like treacle, trickle from his Tongue!

       O Soul congenial to the Souls of ROLLES!

       Whether you tax the luxury of Coals,

       Or vote some necessary millions more,

       To feed an Indian friend’s exhausted store,

       Fain would I praise (if I like thee could praise)

       Thy matchless virtues in congenial lays.

       But, Ah! too weak, &c. &c.

      This apology, however, is like the nolo episcopari of Bishops; for our author continues his panegyric during about one hundred and fifty lines more, after which he proceeds to a task (as he says) more congenial to his abilities, and paints

      ———in smooth confectionary style,

       The simpering sadness of his MULGRAVE’s smile.

      From the character of this nobleman we shall only select a part of one couplet, which tends to elucidate our author’s astonishing powers in imitative harmony,

      ———“within his lab’ring throat

       The shrill shriek struggles with the harsh hoarse note.”

      As we mean to excite, and not to satisfy at once the curiosity of our readers, we shall here put a period to our extracts for the present. We cannot, however, conclude this essay, without observing, that there are very few lines in the whole work which are at all inferior to those we have selected for the entertainment of our readers.

      [1] See the Genealogy, p. xxvii, xxviii.

      [2] Lord Graham.

      * * * * *

       NUMBER III.

      In proof of the assurance with which we concluded our last number, we shall now proceed to give the character of SIR RICHARD HILL.

      Our Readers, probably, are well acquainted with the worthy Baronet’s promiscuous quotations from the Bible and Rochester; and they may possibly remember (if they were awake, when they read them) some elegant verses, which he repeated in the House of Commons, and afterwards inserted in the public papers, as the production of a sleepless Night. We know not, however, if they may so easily recal to mind his remarkable declaration, both of his Loyalty and Religion, in the prettily-turned phrase, “that indeed he loved King GEORGE very well, but he loved King JESUS better.” But as our Poet has alluded to it, we thought necessary to mention it; and for the same reason to add, that like Lord MAHON, Major SCOTT, Mr. ATKINSON, Mr. WILKES, and Captain J. LUTTRELL, he writes his own speeches for the public Reporters. We should also have been happy to have enlivened our commentary with some extracts from the controversy, at which our Author glances; we mean the answer of Sir Richard to Mr. Madan, on the doctrine of Polygamy; a subject, which the tenour of our Baronet’s reading in his two favourite books, peculiarly qualified him to handle with equally pleasantry and orthodoxy. But all our industry to procure his pamphlet unfortunately proved ineffectual. We never saw more of it than the title-page, which we formerly purchased in the lining of a trunk, at the corner of St. Paul’s Church-yard.

      We are conscious, that these introductory explanations must seem doubly dull, to Readers impatient for such exquisite poetry as the ROLLIAD. They appeared, however, indispensible to the due understanding of the verses, which we shall now give without further preface.

      Brother of ROWLAND, or, if yet more dear

       Sounds thy new title, Cousin of a Peer;

       Scholar of various learning, good or evil,

       Alike what God inspir’d, or what the Devil;

       Speaker well skill’d, what no man hears, to write;

       Sleep-giving Poet, of a sleepless night;

       Polemic, Politician, Saint, and Wit,

       Now lashing MADAN, now defending PITT;

       Thy praise shall live till time itself be o’er,

       Friend of King GEORGE, tho’ of King JESUS more!

Скачать книгу