LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

appointed, have they been briefed on the All-source intelligence goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      66. What are the All-source intelligence use cases?

      <--- Score

      67. What All-source intelligence requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      68. What happens if All-source intelligence’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      69. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      70. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      71. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      72. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      73. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      74. Are improvement team members fully trained on All-source intelligence?

      <--- Score

      75. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      76. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      77. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      78. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      79. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      80. How does the All-source intelligence manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      81. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      82. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on All-source intelligence?

      <--- Score

      84. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      85. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      86. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      87. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      88. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      89. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      90. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      91. What would be the goal or target for a All-source intelligence’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      92. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      93. How do you think the partners involved in All-source intelligence would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      94. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      95. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      96. What are the record-keeping requirements of All-source intelligence activities?

      <--- Score

      97. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      98. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      99. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      100. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform All-source intelligence work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      101. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      102. Is special All-source intelligence user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      103. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      104. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected All-source intelligence results are met?

      <--- Score

      105. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      106. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      107. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      108. How are consistent All-source intelligence definitions important?

      <--- Score

      109. Do you have a All-source intelligence success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      110. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      111. Are accountability and ownership for All-source intelligence clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      112. Is there a clear All-source intelligence case definition?

      <--- Score

      113. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      114. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      115. Who is gathering All-source intelligence information?

      <--- Score

      116. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      117. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      118. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      119. Is All-source intelligence required?

      <--- Score

      120. What

Скачать книгу