LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Are losses recognized in a timely manner?

      <--- Score

      100. How are training requirements identified?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Identity In Organizational Communication Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      2. Has a Identity In Organizational Communication requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      3. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      4. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      5. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      6. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      7. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      8. Is the Identity In Organizational Communication scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      9. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      10. How do you gather Identity In Organizational Communication requirements?

      <--- Score

      11. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      12. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      13. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      14. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      15. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      16. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      17. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      18. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      19. Is there any additional Identity In Organizational Communication definition of success?

      <--- Score

      20. Are accountability and ownership for Identity In Organizational Communication clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      21. How do you think the partners involved in Identity In Organizational Communication would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      22. What is the definition of Identity In Organizational Communication excellence?

      <--- Score

      23. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      24. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      25. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      26. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      27. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Identity In Organizational Communication?

      <--- Score

      28. How can the value of Identity In Organizational Communication be defined?

      <--- Score

      29. What are the core elements of the Identity In Organizational Communication business case?

      <--- Score

      30. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      31. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Identity In Organizational Communication? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      32. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      33. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      34. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      35. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      36. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      37. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Identity In Organizational Communication goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      39. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      40. What would be the goal or target for a Identity In Organizational Communication’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      41. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      42. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      43. How would you define Identity In Organizational Communication leadership?

      <--- Score

      44. Is Identity In Organizational Communication currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      45. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      46. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      47. What is out of scope?

      <---

Скачать книгу