LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      76. What happens if Information loss’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      77. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      78. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      79. Have all basic functions of Information loss been defined?

      <--- Score

      80. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      81. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      82. What would be the goal or target for a Information loss’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      83. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      84. What is the scope of Information loss?

      <--- Score

      85. Who is gathering Information loss information?

      <--- Score

      86. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      87. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      88. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      89. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      90. Has the Information loss work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      91. Is there a Information loss management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      92. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      93. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information loss work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      94. How do you manage unclear Information loss requirements?

      <--- Score

      95. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      96. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      97. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      98. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      99. How do you hand over Information loss context?

      <--- Score

      100. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      101. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      102. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      103. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      104. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information loss?

      <--- Score

      105. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Information loss improvements?

      <--- Score

      106. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      107. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      108. Who approved the Information loss scope?

      <--- Score

      109. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?

      <--- Score

      110. Is there a critical path to deliver Information loss results?

      <--- Score

      111. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      112. Is the scope of Information loss defined?

      <--- Score

      113. Why are you doing Information loss and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      114. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      115. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      116. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      117. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      118. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      119. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information loss activities?

      <--- Score

      120. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      121. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      122. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      123. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      124. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      125. Do you have a Information loss success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      126. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      127. How do you think the partners involved in Information loss would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      128. What is the scope of the Information loss effort?

      <--- Score

      129. What are the Information loss use cases?

      <--- Score

      130. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      131. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified

Скачать книгу