LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Is the scope of Software Performance Engineering defined?

      <--- Score

      116. What are the Software Performance Engineering tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      117. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Software Performance Engineering brings?

      <--- Score

      118. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      119. Do you all define Software Performance Engineering in the same way?

      <--- Score

      120. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      121. Will team members perform Software Performance Engineering work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      122. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      123. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      124. How did the Software Performance Engineering manager receive input to the development of a Software Performance Engineering improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      125. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      126. Are the Software Performance Engineering requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      127. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      128. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Software Performance Engineering results are met?

      <--- Score

      129. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      130. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      131. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      132. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      133. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Software Performance Engineering leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      134. Has the Software Performance Engineering work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      135. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      136. Are accountability and ownership for Software Performance Engineering clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      137. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      138. Are improvement team members fully trained on Software Performance Engineering?

      <--- Score

      139. How have you defined all Software Performance Engineering requirements first?

      <--- Score

      140. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      141. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Software Performance Engineering work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Software Performance Engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Do you have any cost Software Performance Engineering limitation requirements?

      <--- Score

      2. What are the costs?

      <--- Score

      3. Have you included everything in your Software Performance Engineering cost models?

      <--- Score

      4. What is the root cause(s) of the problem?

      <--- Score

      5. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      6. At what cost?

      <--- Score

      7. What are the strategic priorities for this year?

      <--- Score

      8. What are the costs of reform?

      <--- Score

      9. Who pays the cost?

      <--- Score

      10. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

      <--- Score

      11. Does the Software Performance Engineering task fit the client’s priorities?

      <--- Score

      12. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

      <--- Score

      13. What evidence is there and what is measured?

      <--- Score

      14. How can you reduce costs?

      <--- Score

      15. What is the total fixed cost?

      <--- Score

      16. Which measures and indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      17. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

      <--- Score

      18. Has a cost center been established?

      <--- Score

      19. What are your key Software Performance Engineering organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?

      <--- Score

      20. How do you measure variability?

      <--- Score

      21. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

      <--- Score

      22. How are measurements made?

Скачать книгу