Скачать книгу

      16. How have you defined all Fault tolerant system requirements first?

      <--- Score

      17. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      18. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      19. Is the Fault tolerant system scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      20. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      21. Will a Fault tolerant system production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      22. Is obsolescence of EEE Parts Failure Modes Required To Build a Fault Tolerant System?

      <--- Score

      23. How can the value of Fault tolerant system be defined?

      <--- Score

      24. How did the Fault tolerant system manager receive input to the development of a Fault tolerant system improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      25. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      26. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      27. What are the Fault tolerant system use cases?

      <--- Score

      28. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      29. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      30. What happens if Fault tolerant system’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      31. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      32. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      33. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      34. What is the definition of Fault tolerant system excellence?

      <--- Score

      35. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      36. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      37. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the dependability requirements of fault tolerant system?

      <--- Score

      39. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      40. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Fault tolerant system results are met?

      <--- Score

      41. Is there a clear Fault tolerant system case definition?

      <--- Score

      42. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      43. Who are the Fault tolerant system improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      44. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      45. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      46. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      47. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      48. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Fault tolerant system leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      49. How do you catch Fault tolerant system definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      50. What would be the goal or target for a Fault tolerant system’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      51. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      52. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Fault tolerant system?

      <--- Score

      53. Do you all define Fault tolerant system in the same way?

      <--- Score

      54. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      55. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      56. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      57. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      58. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      59. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Fault tolerant system changes?

      <--- Score

      60. How do you think the partners involved in Fault tolerant system would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      61. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      62. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      63. Has a Fault tolerant system requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      64. Who is gathering Fault tolerant system information?

      <--- Score

      65. How are consistent Fault tolerant system definitions important?

      <--- Score

      66. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      67. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      68. What are (control) requirements for Fault tolerant system Information?

      <--- Score

      69. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      70. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      71. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      72. Where can you gather more information?

      <---

Скачать книгу