LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      62. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      63. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      64. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Independent risk factors work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      65. Are accountability and ownership for Independent risk factors clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      66. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      67. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      68. How would you define Independent risk factors leadership?

      <--- Score

      69. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      70. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      71. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      72. How do you think the partners involved in Independent risk factors would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      73. Is Independent risk factors linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      74. What sources do you use to gather information for a Independent risk factors study?

      <--- Score

      75. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      76. Do you have a Independent risk factors success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      77. Is the scope of Independent risk factors defined?

      <--- Score

      78. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      79. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      80. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      81. How do you manage changes in Independent risk factors requirements?

      <--- Score

      82. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      83. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      84. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      85. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      86. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Independent risk factors goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      87. What would be the goal or target for a Independent risk factors’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      88. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      89. Is the Independent risk factors scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      90. Has a Independent risk factors requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      91. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      92. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Independent risk factors leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      93. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      94. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      95. What are the core elements of the Independent risk factors business case?

      <--- Score

      96. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      97. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      98. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      99. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      100. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      101. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      102. How do you gather Independent risk factors requirements?

      <--- Score

      103. Has the Independent risk factors work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      104. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Independent risk factors results are met?

      <--- Score

      105. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Independent risk factors?

      <--- Score

      106. How have you defined all Independent risk factors requirements first?

      <--- Score

      107. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      108. When is/was the Independent risk factors start date?

      <--- Score

      109. Will a Independent risk factors production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      110. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      111. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      112. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      113. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      114. How do you catch Independent risk factors definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      115. Has a team charter been developed and

Скачать книгу