LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Who approved the Risk and Safety Statement scope?

      <--- Score

      62. Is Risk and Safety Statement currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      63. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      65. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      66. Are the Risk and Safety Statement requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you manage changes in Risk and Safety Statement requirements?

      <--- Score

      68. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      69. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      70. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      71. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      72. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      73. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      74. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      75. What are the record-keeping requirements of Risk and Safety Statement activities?

      <--- Score

      76. Have all basic functions of Risk and Safety Statement been defined?

      <--- Score

      77. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      78. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      79. How will the Risk and Safety Statement team and the group measure complete success of Risk and Safety Statement?

      <--- Score

      80. What is the scope of the Risk and Safety Statement work?

      <--- Score

      81. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Risk and Safety Statement leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      82. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      84. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      85. How do you manage unclear Risk and Safety Statement requirements?

      <--- Score

      86. What sources do you use to gather information for a Risk and Safety Statement study?

      <--- Score

      87. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      88. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      89. How did the Risk and Safety Statement manager receive input to the development of a Risk and Safety Statement improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      90. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      91. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      92. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      93. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      94. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      95. Is there a clear Risk and Safety Statement case definition?

      <--- Score

      96. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      97. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Risk and Safety Statement results are met?

      <--- Score

      98. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      99. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      100. Will team members regularly document their Risk and Safety Statement work?

      <--- Score

      101. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      102. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      103. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      104. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      105. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Risk and Safety Statement? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      106. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Risk and Safety Statement brings?

      <--- Score

      107. Is special Risk and Safety Statement user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      108. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      109. How does the Risk and Safety Statement manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      110. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      111. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      112. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Risk and Safety Statement goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      113. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      114. What are the core elements of the Risk and Safety Statement business case?

      <--- Score

      115.

Скачать книгу