LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Score

      6. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      7. Do you have a Risk and Safety Statement success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      8. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      9. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      10. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Risk and Safety Statement changes?

      <--- Score

      11. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      12. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      13. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      14. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      15. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      16. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      17. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      18. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      19. Is the scope of Risk and Safety Statement defined?

      <--- Score

      20. What system do you use for gathering Risk and Safety Statement information?

      <--- Score

      21. Is there a critical path to deliver Risk and Safety Statement results?

      <--- Score

      22. What are the Risk and Safety Statement tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      23. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      25. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      26. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      27. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      28. Is there any additional Risk and Safety Statement definition of success?

      <--- Score

      29. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      30. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      31. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      32. Has the Risk and Safety Statement work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      33. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      34. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      35. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Risk and Safety Statement work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      36. How do you think the partners involved in Risk and Safety Statement would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      37. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      38. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      39. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      40. What are (control) requirements for Risk and Safety Statement Information?

      <--- Score

      41. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      42. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      43. Are improvement team members fully trained on Risk and Safety Statement?

      <--- Score

      44. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      45. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      46. Is the Risk and Safety Statement scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      47. Is there a Risk and Safety Statement management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      48. When is/was the Risk and Safety Statement start date?

      <--- Score

      49. How do you hand over Risk and Safety Statement context?

      <--- Score

      50. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      51. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      52. Has a Risk and Safety Statement requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      53. Will a Risk and Safety Statement production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      54. Will team members perform Risk and Safety Statement work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      55. Who are the Risk and Safety Statement improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      56. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      57. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      58. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      59. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      60. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      61.

Скачать книгу