LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

Pain Recognition requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      60. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      61. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Automated Pain Recognition?

      <--- Score

      62. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      63. What would be the goal or target for a Automated Pain Recognition’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      64. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      65. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      66. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      67. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Automated Pain Recognition brings?

      <--- Score

      68. What is the scope of the Automated Pain Recognition work?

      <--- Score

      69. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      70. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      71. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      72. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      73. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      74. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      75. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      76. What are the record-keeping requirements of Automated Pain Recognition activities?

      <--- Score

      77. What is the definition of Automated Pain Recognition excellence?

      <--- Score

      78. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      79. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      80. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Automated Pain Recognition? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      81. How do you manage changes in Automated Pain Recognition requirements?

      <--- Score

      82. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      83. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      84. Is Automated Pain Recognition required?

      <--- Score

      85. Will team members regularly document their Automated Pain Recognition work?

      <--- Score

      86. Will a Automated Pain Recognition production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      87. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Automated Pain Recognition goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      88. How have you defined all Automated Pain Recognition requirements first?

      <--- Score

      89. Have all basic functions of Automated Pain Recognition been defined?

      <--- Score

      90. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      91. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      92. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      93. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      94. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      95. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      96. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      97. Has the Automated Pain Recognition work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      98. Is Automated Pain Recognition currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      99. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      100. When is/was the Automated Pain Recognition start date?

      <--- Score

      101. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      102. What system do you use for gathering Automated Pain Recognition information?

      <--- Score

      103. What is the scope of Automated Pain Recognition?

      <--- Score

      104. How do you think the partners involved in Automated Pain Recognition would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      105. How do you hand over Automated Pain Recognition context?

      <--- Score

      106. Who approved the Automated Pain Recognition scope?

      <--- Score

      107. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      108. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      109. Is there a Automated Pain Recognition management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      110. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      111. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      112. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      113. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and

Скачать книгу