LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?

      <--- Score

      53. Do you recognize Field applications engineering achievements?

      <--- Score

      54. What do you need to start doing?

      <--- Score

      55. What is the problem or issue?

      <--- Score

      56. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Field applications engineering? In other words, what are the risks, if Field applications engineering does not deliver successfully?

      <--- Score

      57. Looking at each person individually – does every one have the qualities which are needed to work in this group?

      <--- Score

      58. What are the expected benefits of Field applications engineering to the stakeholder?

      <--- Score

      59. Are there any revenue recognition issues?

      <--- Score

      60. Where is training needed?

      <--- Score

      61. What vendors make products that address the Field applications engineering needs?

      <--- Score

      62. What Field applications engineering capabilities do you need?

      <--- Score

      63. What is the recognized need?

      <--- Score

      64. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Field applications engineering leader?

      <--- Score

      65. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

      <--- Score

      66. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?

      <--- Score

      67. How are the Field applications engineering’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

      <--- Score

      68. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Field applications engineering team, Field applications engineering itself?

      <--- Score

      69. What needs to be done?

      <--- Score

      70. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?

      <--- Score

      71. What are your needs in relation to Field applications engineering skills, labor, equipment, and markets?

      <--- Score

      72. How do you recognize an Field applications engineering objection?

      <--- Score

      73. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?

      <--- Score

      74. Who needs to know?

      <--- Score

      75. How do you assess your Field applications engineering workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

      <--- Score

      76. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Field applications engineering research related to market response and models?

      <--- Score

      77. Who needs what information?

      <--- Score

      78. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Field applications engineering as an effective investment?

      <--- Score

      79. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?

      <--- Score

      80. Why the need?

      <--- Score

      81. What activities does the governance board need to consider?

      <--- Score

      82. How are you going to measure success?

      <--- Score

      83. Will it solve real problems?

      <--- Score

      84. What is the Field applications engineering problem definition? What do you need to resolve?

      <--- Score

      85. What information do users need?

      <--- Score

      86. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?

      <--- Score

      87. What Field applications engineering events should you attend?

      <--- Score

      88. When a Field applications engineering manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?

      <--- Score

      89. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      90. What creative shifts do you need to take?

      <--- Score

      91. What Field applications engineering coordination do you need?

      <--- Score

      92. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Field applications engineering?

      <--- Score

      93. Is the quality assurance team identified?

      <--- Score

      94. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?

      <--- Score

      95. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks?

      <--- Score

      96. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

      <--- Score

      97. Who should resolve the Field applications engineering issues?

      <--- Score

      98. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?

      <--- Score

      99. Is the need for organizational change recognized?

      <--- Score

      100. Does Field applications engineering create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Field applications engineering Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1.

Скачать книгу