LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      54. How did the Contract risk management software manager receive input to the development of a Contract risk management software improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      55. What Contract risk management software requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      56. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      57. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      58. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      59. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      60. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      61. Is Contract risk management software linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      62. What Contract risk management software services do you require?

      <--- Score

      63. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      65. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      66. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      67. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      68. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      69. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      70. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      71. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      72. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      73. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      74. Are accountability and ownership for Contract risk management software clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      75. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      76. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      77. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      78. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      79. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      80. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Contract risk management software? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      81. What is the scope of Contract risk management software?

      <--- Score

      82. How do you think the partners involved in Contract risk management software would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      83. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      84. Has the Contract risk management software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      85. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      86. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      87. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      88. What happens if Contract risk management software’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      89. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      90. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      91. Is there a Contract risk management software management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      92. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Contract risk management software goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      93. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      94. How do you hand over Contract risk management software context?

      <--- Score

      95. What is the definition of Contract risk management software excellence?

      <--- Score

      96. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      97. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      98. Is there a critical path to deliver Contract risk management software results?

      <--- Score

      99. How do you catch Contract risk management software definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      100. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      101. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      102. How do you gather Contract risk management software requirements?

      <--- Score

      103. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      104. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      105. Has a Contract risk management software requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      106.

Скачать книгу