LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Concurrent system changes?

      <--- Score

      16. What Concurrent system requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      17. What is the scope of the Concurrent system work?

      <--- Score

      18. How will the Concurrent system team and the group measure complete success of Concurrent system?

      <--- Score

      19. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      20. How do you manage changes in Concurrent system requirements?

      <--- Score

      21. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      22. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      23. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      24. Have all basic functions of Concurrent system been defined?

      <--- Score

      25. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      26. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      27. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      28. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      29. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      30. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      31. What are the core elements of the Concurrent system business case?

      <--- Score

      32. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      33. Who are the Concurrent system improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      34. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      35. What are the Concurrent system use cases?

      <--- Score

      36. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      37. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      38. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      39. What are the Concurrent system tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      40. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      41. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      42. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Concurrent system? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      43. Is there a critical path to deliver Concurrent system results?

      <--- Score

      44. How does the Concurrent system manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      45. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      46. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      47. Is the Concurrent system scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      48. Do you have a Concurrent system success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      49. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Concurrent system results are met?

      <--- Score

      50. Are accountability and ownership for Concurrent system clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      51. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      52. Is there a clear Concurrent system case definition?

      <--- Score

      53. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      54. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      55. Will a Concurrent system production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      56. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      57. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      58. Has the Concurrent system work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      59. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      60. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      61. Has a Concurrent system requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      62. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      63. Is there a Concurrent system management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      64. What are (control) requirements for Concurrent system Information?

      <--- Score

      65. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      66. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      67. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      68. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      69. Are the Concurrent system requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      70. Is the Concurrent system scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <---

Скачать книгу