LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

scope?

      <--- Score

      68. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      69. How do you manage changes in Master Planning requirements?

      <--- Score

      70. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      71. How do you think the partners involved in Master Planning would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      72. Why are you doing Master Planning and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      73. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      74. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      75. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      76. Is there any additional Master Planning definition of success?

      <--- Score

      77. What are the core elements of the Master Planning business case?

      <--- Score

      78. Are the Master Planning requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      79. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      80. How can the value of Master Planning be defined?

      <--- Score

      81. How do you manage unclear Master Planning requirements?

      <--- Score

      82. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      83. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      84. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      85. What are the Master Planning tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      86. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Master Planning results are met?

      <--- Score

      87. What happens if Master Planning’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      88. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      89. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Master Planning brings?

      <--- Score

      90. Is the scope of Master Planning defined?

      <--- Score

      91. Will a Master Planning production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      92. What Master Planning services do you require?

      <--- Score

      93. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      94. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      95. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      96. What sources do you use to gather information for a Master Planning study?

      <--- Score

      97. What is the scope of Master Planning?

      <--- Score

      98. Is there a clear Master Planning case definition?

      <--- Score

      99. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      100. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      101. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Master Planning leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      102. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      103. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      104. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      105. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      106. What are (control) requirements for Master Planning Information?

      <--- Score

      107. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      108. Is special Master Planning user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      109. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      110. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Master Planning? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      111. Is the Master Planning scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      112. What are the record-keeping requirements of Master Planning activities?

      <--- Score

      113. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      114. How do you hand over Master Planning context?

      <--- Score

      115. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      116. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      117. Is there a critical path to deliver Master Planning results?

      <--- Score

      118. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      119. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      120. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      121. Have all basic functions of Master Planning been defined?

      <--- Score

      122. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Master Planning goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      123. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      124. How would you define Master Planning leadership?

      <--- Score

      125. How often are the team meetings?

      <---

Скачать книгу