Скачать книгу

      <--- Score

      57. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      58. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      59. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      60. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      61. Who approved the Environmental health action plan scope?

      <--- Score

      62. How did the Environmental health action plan manager receive input to the development of a Environmental health action plan improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      63. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      64. What are the core elements of the Environmental health action plan business case?

      <--- Score

      65. Is Environmental health action plan linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      66. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      67. Is the Environmental health action plan scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      68. Do you all define Environmental health action plan in the same way?

      <--- Score

      69. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      70. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      71. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      72. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental health action plan’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      73. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      74. Is there any additional Environmental health action plan definition of success?

      <--- Score

      75. Has the Environmental health action plan work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      76. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      77. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      78. What Environmental health action plan services do you require?

      <--- Score

      79. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      80. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      81. What Environmental health action plan requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the scope of the Environmental health action plan work?

      <--- Score

      83. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      84. Is special Environmental health action plan user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      85. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      86. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      87. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      88. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      89. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      90. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      91. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      92. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      93. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      94. Is the scope of Environmental health action plan defined?

      <--- Score

      95. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Environmental health action plan? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      96. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      97. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      98. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      99. Is there a clear Environmental health action plan case definition?

      <--- Score

      100. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      101. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      102. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Environmental health action plan changes?

      <--- Score

      103. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      104. Is Environmental health action plan currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      105. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      106. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      107. Have all basic functions of Environmental health action plan been defined?

      <--- Score

      108. How do you hand over Environmental health action plan context?

      <--- Score

      109. How does the Environmental health action plan manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      110. Are accountability and ownership for Environmental health action plan

Скачать книгу