LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

      <--- Score

      76. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      77. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      78. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Event planning brings?

      <--- Score

      79. Do you all define Event planning in the same way?

      <--- Score

      80. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      81. What are the core elements of the Event planning business case?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      83. Is the Event planning scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      84. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      85. Who approved the Event planning scope?

      <--- Score

      86. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      87. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      88. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      89. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      90. Is the Event planning scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      91. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      92. Is there a Event planning management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      93. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      94. Is there a critical path to deliver Event planning results?

      <--- Score

      95. Are accountability and ownership for Event planning clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      96. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      97. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      98. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Event planning? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      99. What would be the goal or target for a Event planning’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      100. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      101. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      102. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      103. Is there a clear Event planning case definition?

      <--- Score

      104. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      105. Have all basic functions of Event planning been defined?

      <--- Score

      106. What are the record-keeping requirements of Event planning activities?

      <--- Score

      107. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      108. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      109. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      110. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      111. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      112. What is the scope of Event planning?

      <--- Score

      113. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      114. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      115. When is/was the Event planning start date?

      <--- Score

      116. Has the Event planning work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      117. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      118. Who are the Event planning improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      119. What Event planning requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      120. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      121. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      122. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      123. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      124. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      125. How have you defined all Event planning requirements first?

      <--- Score

      126. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      127. Is Event planning currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      128. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      129. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback

Скачать книгу