Скачать книгу

      <--- Score

      52. How will the Scientific workflow management system team and the group measure complete success of Scientific workflow management system?

      <--- Score

      53. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      54. Have all basic functions of Scientific workflow management system been defined?

      <--- Score

      55. What is the scope of the Scientific workflow management system effort?

      <--- Score

      56. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Scientific workflow management system?

      <--- Score

      57. Do you all define Scientific workflow management system in the same way?

      <--- Score

      58. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      59. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      60. Is there a clear Scientific workflow management system case definition?

      <--- Score

      61. Who is gathering Scientific workflow management system information?

      <--- Score

      62. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      63. How do you manage changes in Scientific workflow management system requirements?

      <--- Score

      64. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      65. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      66. What is the scope of the Scientific workflow management system work?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you gather Scientific workflow management system requirements?

      <--- Score

      68. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      69. How did the Scientific workflow management system manager receive input to the development of a Scientific workflow management system improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      70. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      71. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      72. Will a Scientific workflow management system production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      73. Is Scientific workflow management system linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      74. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      75. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      76. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      77. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      78. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      79. How do you catch Scientific workflow management system definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      80. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      81. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      82. Who are the Scientific workflow management system improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the record-keeping requirements of Scientific workflow management system activities?

      <--- Score

      84. How have you defined all Scientific workflow management system requirements first?

      <--- Score

      85. What would be the goal or target for a Scientific workflow management system’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      86. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      87. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      88. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Scientific workflow management system? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      89. Will team members regularly document their Scientific workflow management system work?

      <--- Score

      90. What are the core elements of the Scientific workflow management system business case?

      <--- Score

      91. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      92. Is the Scientific workflow management system scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      93. What is the scope of Scientific workflow management system?

      <--- Score

      94. What are the Scientific workflow management system use cases?

      <--- Score

      95. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      96. Are the Scientific workflow management system requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      97. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      98. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      99. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      100. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      101. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      102. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      103. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      104. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      105. What Scientific workflow management system services do you require?

      <--- Score

Скачать книгу