LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

logistics work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      69. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      70. Is special Information logistics user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      71. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      72. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      73. Who are the Information logistics improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      74. What are the Information logistics use cases?

      <--- Score

      75. Who approved the Information logistics scope?

      <--- Score

      76. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      77. Is the scope of Information logistics defined?

      <--- Score

      78. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      79. Are the Information logistics requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      80. What are (control) requirements for Information logistics Information?

      <--- Score

      81. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      82. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      83. Have all basic functions of Information logistics been defined?

      <--- Score

      84. How did the Information logistics manager receive input to the development of a Information logistics improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      85. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      86. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      87. Is there a critical path to deliver Information logistics results?

      <--- Score

      88. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      89. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      90. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      91. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      92. What is the definition of Information logistics excellence?

      <--- Score

      93. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      94. Is Information logistics required?

      <--- Score

      95. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      96. Is the Information logistics scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      97. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Information logistics goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      98. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      99. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      100. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      101. What sources do you use to gather information for a Information logistics study?

      <--- Score

      102. Is the Information logistics scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      103. Will team members regularly document their Information logistics work?

      <--- Score

      104. What is the scope of Information logistics?

      <--- Score

      105. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      106. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information logistics leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      107. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      108. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      109. Is Information logistics linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      110. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Information logistics results are met?

      <--- Score

      111. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      112. Do you all define Information logistics in the same way?

      <--- Score

      113. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information logistics work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      114. How do you hand over Information logistics context?

      <--- Score

      115. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information logistics? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      116. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      117. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information logistics activities?

      <--- Score

      118. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      119. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      120. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      121. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      122.

Скачать книгу