LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

      <--- Score

      64. Is there a clear Resource economics case definition?

      <--- Score

      65. What is the definition of Resource economics excellence?

      <--- Score

      66. Is the Resource economics scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you catch Resource economics definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      68. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      69. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      70. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      71. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      72. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      73. Will team members regularly document their Resource economics work?

      <--- Score

      74. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      75. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      76. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Resource economics results are met?

      <--- Score

      77. Who is gathering Resource economics information?

      <--- Score

      78. Are accountability and ownership for Resource economics clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      79. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      80. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      81. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      82. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Resource economics?

      <--- Score

      84. When is/was the Resource economics start date?

      <--- Score

      85. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      86. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      87. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      88. Is there a critical path to deliver Resource economics results?

      <--- Score

      89. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      90. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      91. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      92. How do you gather Resource economics requirements?

      <--- Score

      93. What system do you use for gathering Resource economics information?

      <--- Score

      94. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      95. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      96. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      97. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      98. Are the Resource economics requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      99. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Resource economics work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      100. What is the scope of the Resource economics effort?

      <--- Score

      101. Why are you doing Resource economics and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      102. What is the scope of Resource economics?

      <--- Score

      103. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      104. Is special Resource economics user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      105. How will the Resource economics team and the group measure complete success of Resource economics?

      <--- Score

      106. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      107. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Resource economics? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      108. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      109. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      110. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      111. What are the core elements of the Resource economics business case?

      <--- Score

      112. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      113. Has the Resource economics work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      114. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      115. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      116. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      117. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      118. What happens if Resource economics’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      119. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <---

Скачать книгу