LITMIR.BIZ

Скачать книгу

cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the ELK stack Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What would be a real cause for concern?

      <--- Score

      2. Are there any easy-to-implement alternatives to ELK stack? Sometimes other solutions are available that do not require the cost implications of a full-blown project?

      <--- Score

      3. What are hidden ELK stack quality costs?

      <--- Score

      4. Why do the measurements/indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      5. How frequently do you track ELK stack measures?

      <--- Score

      6. Which measures and indicators matter?

      <--- Score

      7. Where can you go to verify the info?

      <--- Score

      8. What is the total cost related to deploying ELK stack, including any consulting or professional services?

      <--- Score

      9. Among the ELK stack product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

      <--- Score

      10. What are you verifying?

      <--- Score

      11. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?

      <--- Score

      12. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

      <--- Score

      13. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

      <--- Score

      14. The approach of traditional ELK stack works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?

      <--- Score

      15. Has a cost center been established?

      <--- Score

      16. How much does it cost?

      <--- Score

      17. Are ELK stack vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

      <--- Score

      18. What do people want to verify?

      <--- Score

      19. What are the types and number of measures to use?

      <--- Score

      20. What is the cause of any ELK stack gaps?

      <--- Score

      21. Is a follow-up focused external ELK stack review required?

      <--- Score

      22. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

      <--- Score

      23. What is measured? Why?

      <--- Score

      24. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?

      <--- Score

      25. How do you verify your resources?

      <--- Score

      26. Why a ELK stack focus?

      <--- Score

      27. When a disaster occurs, who gets priority?

      <--- Score

      28. Are missed ELK stack opportunities costing your organization money?

      <--- Score

      29. Are there competing ELK stack priorities?

      <--- Score

      30. What users will be impacted?

      <--- Score

      31. How to cause the change?

      <--- Score

      32. How is the value delivered by ELK stack being measured?

      <--- Score

      33. How do you focus on what is right -not who is right?

      <--- Score

      34. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

      <--- Score

      35. What is an unallowable cost?

      <--- Score

      36. What are the current costs of the ELK stack process?

      <--- Score

      37. What can be used to verify compliance?

      <--- Score

      38. Where is the cost?

      <--- Score

      39. What are your operating costs?

      <--- Score

      40. What causes extra work or rework?

      <--- Score

      41. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      42. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

      <--- Score

      43. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?

      <--- Score

      44. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

      <--- Score

      45. Does the ELK stack task fit the client’s priorities?

      <--- Score

      46. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

      <--- Score

      47. What does verifying compliance entail?

      <--- Score

      48. What relevant entities could be measured?

      <--- Score

      49. How will effects be measured?

      <--- Score

      50. What tests verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      51. What is the cost of rework?

      <--- Score

      52. What is your ELK stack quality cost segregation study?

      <--- Score

      53. Are there measurements based on task performance?

      <--- Score

      54. How do you prevent mis-estimating

Скачать книгу